Numerical evaluation of fibre anchor configurations in cfrp-strengthened concrete beams

• FE model predicted peak load with over 95 % accuracy. • Beam geometry governs anchor efficiency and CFRP utilisation. • 100 mm embedment depth ensures full CFRP tensile mobilisation in T-beams. • Optimal anchor spacing found to be 140 mm for flexural performance. • Non-effective anchorage zone defined within 16 % of shear span. This study presents a detailed numerical investigation of beams strengthened with CFRP sheets and anchored using splay type fibre systems. Finite element models were developed in ABAQUS and validated against full scale tests with over 95 % accuracy in predicting ultimate load. The models reproduced the load–deflection behaviour and failure modes with high fidelity, supporting the parametric study. For T-section beams, the analysis examined embedment depth, anchor spacing, and end-anchor removal. For rectangular beams, it focused on embedment depth for two web sizes. In T beams, a 100 mm embedment depth prevented pull out and caused CFRP rupture, confirming full tensile mobilisation. An optimal 140 mm spacing maintained effective stress transfer, while wider spacing induced premature debonding. End anchors within 16 % of the shear span contributed negligibly, defining a non-effective anchorage zone. In rectangular beams, capacity plateaued with deeper embedment as early concrete crushing limited the mobilisation of the CFRP. Increasing the web depth from 305 mm to 350 mm produced only a minor capacity increase. These findings demonstrate that beam geometry strongly governs anchor performance and provide guidance for efficient CFRP strengthening design.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108711
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical evaluation of fibre anchor configurations in cfrp-strengthened concrete beams

Asal Pournaghshband, Mohammed A. Zaki
Results in Engineering
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Numerical evaluation of fibre anchor configurations in cfrp-strengthened concrete beams

Asal Pournaghshband, Mohammed A. Zaki
article en

Abstract

• FE model predicted peak load with over 95 % accuracy. • Beam geometry governs anchor efficiency and CFRP utilisation. • 100 mm embedment depth ensures full CFRP tensile mobilisation in T-beams. • Optimal anchor spacing found to be 140 mm for flexural performance. • Non-effective anchorage zone defined within 16 % of shear span. This study presents a detailed numerical investigation of beams strengthened with CFRP sheets and anchored using splay type fibre systems. Finite element models were developed in ABAQUS and validated against full scale tests with over 95 % accuracy in predicting ultimate load. The models reproduced the load–deflection behaviour and failure modes with high fidelity, supporting the parametric study. For T-section beams, the analysis examined embedment depth, anchor spacing, and end-anchor removal. For rectangular beams, it focused on embedment depth for two web sizes. In T beams, a 100 mm embedment depth prevented pull out and caused CFRP rupture, confirming full tensile mobilisation. An optimal 140 mm spacing maintained effective stress transfer, while wider spacing induced premature debonding. End anchors within 16 % of the shear span contributed negligibly, defining a non-effective anchorage zone. In rectangular beams, capacity plateaued with deeper embedment as early concrete crushing limited the mobilisation of the CFRP. Increasing the web depth from 305 mm to 350 mm produced only a minor capacity increase. These findings demonstrate that beam geometry strongly governs anchor performance and provide guidance for efficient CFRP strengthening design.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.