Understanding the role of intersectional identity constructs on psychological well-being of Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM) in San Diego, California: A cross-sectional analysis of the NEXUS study

Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM) experience substantial mental health inequities, partly due to intersectional stigma related to their Latino, masculine (i.e., conceptualized as a spectrum of gendered expectations, where both endorsement and non-endorsement of traditional masculine norms shape experience), and sexual identities. While prior research has examined identity valence (e.g., internalized stigma, pride) and magnitude (e.g., centrality, salience), little is known about how these constructs jointly influence mental health from an intersectional lens. This study explores the impact of intersectional identity constructs on psychological well-being among LMSM in San Diego, California. We analyzed baseline data from 503 participants enrolled in the NEXUS study, a longitudinal cohort investigating intersectional stigma and HIV prevention using social network methods. Participants reported on identity centrality, salience, internalized stigma, and pride across Latino, masculine, and sexual identities. Mental health outcomes included depression (CESD-10), anxiety (GAD-7), and resilience (CD-RISC-10). Structural equation modeling assessed a measurement model of latent intersectional identity constructs and their associations with psychological well-being. Higher intersectional internalized stigma and identity salience were associated with greater depression (β = 0.33, p < 0.001; β = 0.25, p < 0.001) and anxiety (β = 0.33, p < 0.001; β = 0.22, p < 0.001). Identity centrality was negatively associated with depression (β = −0.14, p = 0.037). Pride was positively associated with resilience (β = 0.16, p = 0.038), while internalized stigma was negatively associated (β = −0.25, p = 0.001). Intersectional internalized stigma and identity salience may harm mental health, while centrality and pride show protective effects. Findings highlight the importance of intersectional frameworks in mental health care for LMSM. • This study modeled stigma across Latino, masculine, and sexual identities using SEM. • Internalized stigma and salience were linked to more anxiety and depression. • Intersectional pride was positively associated with psychological resilience. • Identity centrality showed protective effects against depressive symptoms. • Findings support intersectional stigma-informed mental health interventions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Mental Health
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100576
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the role of intersectional identity constructs on psychological well-being of Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM) in San Diego, California: A cross-sectional analysis of the NEXUS study

Carl A. Latkin, Angel B. Algarin, Laramie R. Smith, Bruce Davenport et al.
SSM - Mental Health
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Understanding the role of intersectional identity constructs on psychological well-being of Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM) in San Diego, California: A cross-sectional analysis of the NEXUS study

Carl A. Latkin, Angel B. Algarin, Laramie R. Smith, Bruce Davenport, R. A. Vázquez, Aarón Gutiérrez, Britt Skaathun, Nicole K. Kelly, Heather A. Pines, Veronica Moore, Eileen V. Pitpitan, Maryam Hussain, Francisco Soto, Juan Esparaza, Malek Guerbaoui, Renee El Krab
article en

Abstract

Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM) experience substantial mental health inequities, partly due to intersectional stigma related to their Latino, masculine (i.e., conceptualized as a spectrum of gendered expectations, where both endorsement and non-endorsement of traditional masculine norms shape experience), and sexual identities. While prior research has examined identity valence (e.g., internalized stigma, pride) and magnitude (e.g., centrality, salience), little is known about how these constructs jointly influence mental health from an intersectional lens. This study explores the impact of intersectional identity constructs on psychological well-being among LMSM in San Diego, California. We analyzed baseline data from 503 participants enrolled in the NEXUS study, a longitudinal cohort investigating intersectional stigma and HIV prevention using social network methods. Participants reported on identity centrality, salience, internalized stigma, and pride across Latino, masculine, and sexual identities. Mental health outcomes included depression (CESD-10), anxiety (GAD-7), and resilience (CD-RISC-10). Structural equation modeling assessed a measurement model of latent intersectional identity constructs and their associations with psychological well-being. Higher intersectional internalized stigma and identity salience were associated with greater depression (β = 0.33, p < 0.001; β = 0.25, p < 0.001) and anxiety (β = 0.33, p < 0.001; β = 0.22, p < 0.001). Identity centrality was negatively associated with depression (β = −0.14, p = 0.037). Pride was positively associated with resilience (β = 0.16, p = 0.038), while internalized stigma was negatively associated (β = −0.25, p = 0.001). Intersectional internalized stigma and identity salience may harm mental health, while centrality and pride show protective effects. Findings highlight the importance of intersectional frameworks in mental health care for LMSM. • This study modeled stigma across Latino, masculine, and sexual identities using SEM. • Internalized stigma and salience were linked to more anxiety and depression. • Intersectional pride was positively associated with psychological resilience. • Identity centrality showed protective effects against depressive symptoms. • Findings support intersectional stigma-informed mental health interventions.

SSM - Mental HealthVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.