Nicholas Rescher's Theory of Intuition

Abstract Nicholas Rescher was no stranger to the philosophy of mathematics or the philosophy of science, but his interests ranged to general epistemology and to the metaphysics of abstract objects. His epistemology combined Aristotle's insight that there are important propositions that can be known but not demonstrated with a conception of how we might intuitively apprehend such propositions. With admirable brevity, he provides a sketch of intuition as a rational capacity; a conception of its deliverances—which are specific intuitions—that allows for intuitive self-knowledge as well as for knowledge of what is external to the mind; and pragmatic criteria for choice among axiom sets. This paper traces some of his thinking about these matters and suggests how he successfully combines mathematical realism with a pragmatic theory of axiom choice in mathematics and theory choice in empirical science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Philosophical Quarterly
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.63.1.07
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nicholas Rescher's Theory of Intuition

Robert Audi
American Philosophical Quarterly
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Nicholas Rescher's Theory of Intuition

Robert Audi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nicholas Rescher was no stranger to the philosophy of mathematics or the philosophy of science, but his interests ranged to general epistemology and to the metaphysics of abstract objects. His epistemology combined Aristotle's insight that there are important propositions that can be known but not demonstrated with a conception of how we might intuitively apprehend such propositions. With admirable brevity, he provides a sketch of intuition as a rational capacity; a conception of its deliverances—which are specific intuitions—that allows for intuitive self-knowledge as well as for knowledge of what is external to the mind; and pragmatic criteria for choice among axiom sets. This paper traces some of his thinking about these matters and suggests how he successfully combines mathematical realism with a pragmatic theory of axiom choice in mathematics and theory choice in empirical science.

American Philosophical QuarterlyVol. 63(1)
University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.