Do private forest owners in Poland recognise Natura 2000 areas?

A bstract Private forest owners in Poland, like those in many other European Union countries, should be viewed as a diverse social group. Due to the size and diversity of private forest owners, one of the most effective ways to understand and categorise them is by examining their values, opinions, views and intentions. The analysis aimed to investigate differences between three respondent groups, distinguished by their level of knowledge about Natura 2000 sites. The research was conducted using the Computer-Assisted Personal Interview method, employing a standardised interview questionnaire that included both content questions and respondent metrics. Three levels of knowledge among respondents were identified: those who said they knew about Natura 2000 sites and correctly defined them (labelled as ‘experts’ – 397 respondents, 39.6%), those who knew what Natura 2000 sites were but did not confirm their knowledge with the correct definition (labelled as ‘amateurs’ – 224 respondents, 22.4%) and those who admitted they did not know what Natura 2000 sites were (labelled as ‘laypeople’ – 382 respondents, 38.0%). Forest owners can be considered a homogeneous group regardless of their knowledge of Natura 2000 sites, and awareness campaigns or financial support can be directed the same way across all groups. Irrespective of how forest owners were categorised, no differences were found in their approaches to types of services, forest functions, time spent on training topics or the tax amounts allocated. Controlling forest pests remains the most critical area of support for private forest owners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Forestalia Polonica
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2025-0019
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do private forest owners in Poland recognise Natura 2000 areas?

Emilia Wysocka-Fijorek, Vasyl Mohytych, Piotr Gołos, Wojciech Gil et al.
Folia Forestalia Polonica
Forest Management and Policy
article

Do private forest owners in Poland recognise Natura 2000 areas?

Emilia Wysocka-Fijorek, Vasyl Mohytych, Piotr Gołos, Wojciech Gil, Zbigniew Karaszewski
article en

Abstract

A bstract Private forest owners in Poland, like those in many other European Union countries, should be viewed as a diverse social group. Due to the size and diversity of private forest owners, one of the most effective ways to understand and categorise them is by examining their values, opinions, views and intentions. The analysis aimed to investigate differences between three respondent groups, distinguished by their level of knowledge about Natura 2000 sites. The research was conducted using the Computer-Assisted Personal Interview method, employing a standardised interview questionnaire that included both content questions and respondent metrics. Three levels of knowledge among respondents were identified: those who said they knew about Natura 2000 sites and correctly defined them (labelled as ‘experts’ – 397 respondents, 39.6%), those who knew what Natura 2000 sites were but did not confirm their knowledge with the correct definition (labelled as ‘amateurs’ – 224 respondents, 22.4%) and those who admitted they did not know what Natura 2000 sites were (labelled as ‘laypeople’ – 382 respondents, 38.0%). Forest owners can be considered a homogeneous group regardless of their knowledge of Natura 2000 sites, and awareness campaigns or financial support can be directed the same way across all groups. Irrespective of how forest owners were categorised, no differences were found in their approaches to types of services, forest functions, time spent on training topics or the tax amounts allocated. Controlling forest pests remains the most critical area of support for private forest owners.

Folia Forestalia PolonicaVol. 67(4)
Forest Research Institute (HU), Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.