Optimization of a Tracking-Based Approach for Calculating Energy Expenditure and Aerobic–Anaerobic Supplies During Intermittent Running: Improved Simulation of Oxygen Uptake Within the Metabolic Power Model

In intermittent sports, tracking technologies are commonly used to monitor external and internal loads. The metabolic power model solely uses speed and acceleration data to simulate metabolic power, oxygen uptake, energy expenditure, and aerobic-anaerobic supplies. This study aimed to improve the simulation of oxygen uptake within the metabolic power model, thereby increasing its validity to estimate metabolic loads during intermittent running. Twelve male athletes (24 ± 3 years) performed different intermittent running-based exercises. These data were previously collected and used for secondary analysis within this study. The simulation of oxygen uptake was optimized by different approaches: (i) formerly detected bias (Offset model), (ii) data-driven modeling using differential evolution (Mongin model), and (iii) correction of the aerobic supply calculation. The simulations were compared to the measured oxygen uptake via a portable respiratory gas analyzer and the resulting metabolic loads to those derived by the established 3-component model. For statistical analysis, one-way repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman test with corresponding effect sizes were applied. Overall, the Mongin model demonstrated the best predictive accuracy (MAE = 4.99 ± 1.12 mL/min/kg) compared to measured oxygen uptake and, combined with the corrected calculation, total energy expenditure and aerobic supply did not significantly differ to the standard (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.056; trivial to large effect sizes). In conclusion, our optimizations reduce discrepancies of the tracking-based metabolic power model regarding total energy expenditure and aerobic supply compared to the established 3-component model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25247568
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of a Tracking-Based Approach for Calculating Energy Expenditure and Aerobic–Anaerobic Supplies During Intermittent Running: Improved Simulation of Oxygen Uptake Within the Metabolic Power Model

Christian Baumgart, Joana Brochhagen, M.W. Hoppe, Tjorven Schnack
Sensors
Sports Performance and Training
article

Optimization of a Tracking-Based Approach for Calculating Energy Expenditure and Aerobic–Anaerobic Supplies During Intermittent Running: Improved Simulation of Oxygen Uptake Within the Metabolic Power Model

Christian Baumgart, Joana Brochhagen, M.W. Hoppe, Tjorven Schnack
article en

Abstract

In intermittent sports, tracking technologies are commonly used to monitor external and internal loads. The metabolic power model solely uses speed and acceleration data to simulate metabolic power, oxygen uptake, energy expenditure, and aerobic-anaerobic supplies. This study aimed to improve the simulation of oxygen uptake within the metabolic power model, thereby increasing its validity to estimate metabolic loads during intermittent running. Twelve male athletes (24 ± 3 years) performed different intermittent running-based exercises. These data were previously collected and used for secondary analysis within this study. The simulation of oxygen uptake was optimized by different approaches: (i) formerly detected bias (Offset model), (ii) data-driven modeling using differential evolution (Mongin model), and (iii) correction of the aerobic supply calculation. The simulations were compared to the measured oxygen uptake via a portable respiratory gas analyzer and the resulting metabolic loads to those derived by the established 3-component model. For statistical analysis, one-way repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman test with corresponding effect sizes were applied. Overall, the Mongin model demonstrated the best predictive accuracy (MAE = 4.99 ± 1.12 mL/min/kg) compared to measured oxygen uptake and, combined with the corrected calculation, total energy expenditure and aerobic supply did not significantly differ to the standard (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.056; trivial to large effect sizes). In conclusion, our optimizations reduce discrepancies of the tracking-based metabolic power model regarding total energy expenditure and aerobic supply compared to the established 3-component model.

SensorsVol. 25(24)
University of Vienna (AT), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), University of Wuppertal (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.