Vegetation patterns pinpoint the least resilient dryland sites

Abstract Resource‐limited ecosystems, such as drylands, can exhibit self‐organized spatial patterns. Theory suggests that changes in these patterns can inform about the ecosystem degradation level. While the current theory is expected to work well when following a given site in time, we still lack ways of comparing different field sites using static observations of vegetation spatial structure. Such methods would be crucial to pinpoint the least fragile ecosystem areas from observation of spatial structure. Here, we tackle these limitations using an inverse‐modelling approach relying on Approximate Bayesian Computing, which uses a snapshot of the spatial structure of ecosystems characterized by so‐called irregular patterns and estimates a distance to its desertification point regardless of whether it is reached via progressive or sudden degradation. The approach allows us to comparably rank sites according to their distance to their desertification point (i.e. their resilience). We validated the approach on simulated landscapes from different models, showing that the approach performs well at ranking all landscapes. We applied the approach to a global dryland dataset and investigated the drivers of the estimated distances to desertification. We emphasized a possible application of our approach by combining these distances to desertification with aridity projections to illustrate the possibility of integrating our approach into the risk assessment of drylands. This made it possible to pinpoint the least resilient sites among those studied, therefore, paving the way for a risk‐assessment method for spatially organized ecosystems. Our inverse‐modelling approach can be extended to other ecosystems and other types of spatial patterns (e.g. periodic patterns). By allowing linking spatial structure and ecosystem resilience, it offers a promising development toward comparing and ranking sites of self‐organized ecosystems from a single snapshot of their spatial structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70205
Primary Topic
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vegetation patterns pinpoint the least resilient dryland sites

Sonia Kéfi, Isabelle Gounand, Benôıt Pichon, Sophie Donnet
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
article

Vegetation patterns pinpoint the least resilient dryland sites

Sonia Kéfi, Isabelle Gounand, Benôıt Pichon, Sophie Donnet
article en

Abstract

Abstract Resource‐limited ecosystems, such as drylands, can exhibit self‐organized spatial patterns. Theory suggests that changes in these patterns can inform about the ecosystem degradation level. While the current theory is expected to work well when following a given site in time, we still lack ways of comparing different field sites using static observations of vegetation spatial structure. Such methods would be crucial to pinpoint the least fragile ecosystem areas from observation of spatial structure. Here, we tackle these limitations using an inverse‐modelling approach relying on Approximate Bayesian Computing, which uses a snapshot of the spatial structure of ecosystems characterized by so‐called irregular patterns and estimates a distance to its desertification point regardless of whether it is reached via progressive or sudden degradation. The approach allows us to comparably rank sites according to their distance to their desertification point (i.e. their resilience). We validated the approach on simulated landscapes from different models, showing that the approach performs well at ranking all landscapes. We applied the approach to a global dryland dataset and investigated the drivers of the estimated distances to desertification. We emphasized a possible application of our approach by combining these distances to desertification with aridity projections to illustrate the possibility of integrating our approach into the risk assessment of drylands. This made it possible to pinpoint the least resilient sites among those studied, therefore, paving the way for a risk‐assessment method for spatially organized ecosystems. Our inverse‐modelling approach can be extended to other ecosystems and other types of spatial patterns (e.g. periodic patterns). By allowing linking spatial structure and ecosystem resilience, it offers a promising development toward comparing and ranking sites of self‐organized ecosystems from a single snapshot of their spatial structure.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 17(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Santa Fe Institute (US), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Département mathématiques, informatique, sciences de la donnée et technologies du numérique (FR), Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (FR), Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.