Carbon Peaking Pathways of High-Density Urban Buildings Under Dual-Control Policies: The Case of Guangzhou

High-density cities face increasing pressure to curb the rapid growth of building-sector carbon emissions, yet the specific impacts of China’s dual-control policy—regulating both total emissions and emission intensity—remain insufficiently understood. To address this gap, this study aims to quantify how dual-control constraints shape urban building-emission trajectories by developing a dynamic scenario model that integrates both operational and embodied emissions while accounting for technological progress, energy-structure adjustments, and socioeconomic change. The model is applied to Guangzhou, a representative high-density metropolis in China’s low-carbon transition. Three policy scenarios are evaluated: a baseline pathway reflecting existing trends, an energy-conservation pathway emphasizing efficiency improvements, and a deep-decarbonization pathway that combines enhanced efficiency with accelerated clean-energy adoption. The results show that rising residential energy demand is the primary driver of emission growth, whereas technological advancement provides the strongest mitigation potential. Under the energy-conservation scenario, emissions are projected to peak around 2029, consistent with China’s national carbon-peaking target for 2030. Overall, the findings offer clear empirical evidence and actionable policy insights for accelerating urban decarbonization in high-density contexts under dual-control constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244504
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Peaking Pathways of High-Density Urban Buildings Under Dual-Control Policies: The Case of Guangzhou

Xiaojie Chen, Yicong Huang, Lingchun Hou, Haiyan Huang et al.
1 citations
Buildings
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Carbon Peaking Pathways of High-Density Urban Buildings Under Dual-Control Policies: The Case of Guangzhou

Xiaojie Chen, Yicong Huang, Lingchun Hou, Haiyan Huang, Song‐Ping Han
article en
1 citations

Abstract

High-density cities face increasing pressure to curb the rapid growth of building-sector carbon emissions, yet the specific impacts of China’s dual-control policy—regulating both total emissions and emission intensity—remain insufficiently understood. To address this gap, this study aims to quantify how dual-control constraints shape urban building-emission trajectories by developing a dynamic scenario model that integrates both operational and embodied emissions while accounting for technological progress, energy-structure adjustments, and socioeconomic change. The model is applied to Guangzhou, a representative high-density metropolis in China’s low-carbon transition. Three policy scenarios are evaluated: a baseline pathway reflecting existing trends, an energy-conservation pathway emphasizing efficiency improvements, and a deep-decarbonization pathway that combines enhanced efficiency with accelerated clean-energy adoption. The results show that rising residential energy demand is the primary driver of emission growth, whereas technological advancement provides the strongest mitigation potential. Under the energy-conservation scenario, emissions are projected to peak around 2029, consistent with China’s national carbon-peaking target for 2030. Overall, the findings offer clear empirical evidence and actionable policy insights for accelerating urban decarbonization in high-density contexts under dual-control constraints.

BuildingsVol. 15(24)
Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN), Chongqing University (CN), University of Macau (MO), Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University (CN), City University of Macau (MO), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.