One-Year Follow-Up of Two Intensive Supplemental Reading and Mathematics Programs in Swedish Elementary School

This study presents the one-year follow-up in grade 3 of two randomized controlled interventions, addressing phonics and numeracy targeting children at-risk for early reading or mathematics difficulties. The participants (n = 130) had been part of two intervention studies including 21 Swedish elementary schools. Results show that the post-test advantage of the intervention groups had faded for most outcome measures. A significant difference between groups sustained only for conceptual knowledge in the mathematics intervention group and for the speeded reading test in the reading intervention group. These results raise questions about the integration of rigorous interventions into mainstream education. Furthermore, the study pinpoints the importance of longitudinal intervention research and conditions to make special education interventions sustainable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121678
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One-Year Follow-Up of Two Intensive Supplemental Reading and Mathematics Programs in Swedish Elementary School

Stefan Samuelsson, Åsa Elwér, Henrik Danielsson, Joakim Samuelsson et al.
Education Sciences
Reading and Literacy Development
article

One-Year Follow-Up of Two Intensive Supplemental Reading and Mathematics Programs in Swedish Elementary School

Stefan Samuelsson, Åsa Elwér, Henrik Danielsson, Joakim Samuelsson, Hanna Lindström‐Sandahl
article en

Abstract

This study presents the one-year follow-up in grade 3 of two randomized controlled interventions, addressing phonics and numeracy targeting children at-risk for early reading or mathematics difficulties. The participants (n = 130) had been part of two intervention studies including 21 Swedish elementary schools. Results show that the post-test advantage of the intervention groups had faded for most outcome measures. A significant difference between groups sustained only for conceptual knowledge in the mathematics intervention group and for the speeded reading test in the reading intervention group. These results raise questions about the integration of rigorous interventions into mainstream education. Furthermore, the study pinpoints the importance of longitudinal intervention research and conditions to make special education interventions sustainable.

Education SciencesVol. 15(12)
Linköping University (SE), Swedish Institute (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.