Rapid Evaluation of Off-Highway Powertrain Architectures

Task-specific off-highway vehicles are typically produced in small volumes, so limited resources must be used in their design. The fuel efficiency benefits of hybridizing an off-highway vehicle are typically in the range of 10–30%, meaning that a simulation tool should ideally be able to predict fuel usage within about ±10%, to support stage-gate design decisions. However, such simulation tools typically require significant cost, setup effort, and simulation expertise. A wheel loader and four agricultural tractors were analyzed with a new tool, “ePOP Concept (v1.0)” from ZeBeyond Ltd. of Leamington Spa, UK, to estimate the benefits of electrification. This method is quick to set up, requiring minimal data preparation and simulation expertise. The results were compared with measured fuel consumption data, and with those of commercially available analysis tools. The errors deriving from ePOP Concept’s BSFC assumptions alone were large at 17% RMS when using a generic value for engine BSFC, but could be improved to 6.7% RMS when applying a readily available minimum BSFC value in the model setup. For future development, a target accuracy of ±10% could potentially be achieved with one-dimensional loss models, requiring minimal extra setup effort, while reducing the subject BSFC errors to 3.9% RMS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16120671
Primary Topic
Vehicle emissions and performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid Evaluation of Off-Highway Powertrain Architectures

R. Tull de Salis
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Vehicle emissions and performance
article

Rapid Evaluation of Off-Highway Powertrain Architectures

R. Tull de Salis
article en

Abstract

Task-specific off-highway vehicles are typically produced in small volumes, so limited resources must be used in their design. The fuel efficiency benefits of hybridizing an off-highway vehicle are typically in the range of 10–30%, meaning that a simulation tool should ideally be able to predict fuel usage within about ±10%, to support stage-gate design decisions. However, such simulation tools typically require significant cost, setup effort, and simulation expertise. A wheel loader and four agricultural tractors were analyzed with a new tool, “ePOP Concept (v1.0)” from ZeBeyond Ltd. of Leamington Spa, UK, to estimate the benefits of electrification. This method is quick to set up, requiring minimal data preparation and simulation expertise. The results were compared with measured fuel consumption data, and with those of commercially available analysis tools. The errors deriving from ePOP Concept’s BSFC assumptions alone were large at 17% RMS when using a generic value for engine BSFC, but could be improved to 6.7% RMS when applying a readily available minimum BSFC value in the model setup. For future development, a target accuracy of ±10% could potentially be achieved with one-dimensional loss models, requiring minimal extra setup effort, while reducing the subject BSFC errors to 3.9% RMS.

World Electric Vehicle JournalVol. 16(12)
Leamington Spa Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Vehicle emissions and performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.