Caregiver perceptions of healthcare barriers across traditional and digital contexts: a mixed-methods analysis

As digital health expanded during COVID-19, understanding how caregivers perceive differences between traditional and digital care became critical. In a purposive sample of female caregivers of school-age children with elevated mental health symptoms (n = 47), we used a convergent mixed-methods design to compare reported experiences across modalities. Thematic analysis revealed that participants described different barrier patterns: financial concerns were reported in both contexts, but with different characteristics (insurance/copays vs. device/subscription costs). Participants reported distinct digital challenges, relational connection loss, digital literacy gaps, and privacy concerns, while facilitators also differed. Traditional care narratives emphasized interpersonal support, while digital care highlighted accessibility and personalization. Social identity intersections were referenced more frequently in traditional care narratives, though demographic correlations suggested continued relevance in digital contexts. These pandemic-era findings from female caregivers generate hypotheses for designing inclusive digital health approaches and highlight areas for longitudinal research tracking actual transitions between care modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02131-x
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caregiver perceptions of healthcare barriers across traditional and digital contexts: a mixed-methods analysis

Jacqueline B. Duong, Matthew W. Ahle, Daniela Romero, Natalia Simo Fiallo et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Caregiver perceptions of healthcare barriers across traditional and digital contexts: a mixed-methods analysis

Jacqueline B. Duong, Matthew W. Ahle, Daniela Romero, Natalia Simo Fiallo, Shrikanth Narayanan, Adela C. Timmons, Theodora Chaspari, Kayla E. Carta, Sierra N. Walters, Stacy L. Frazier, Jonathan S. Comer, Alyssa S. Carrasco, Grace Jumonville, Ishita P. Khurd
article en

Abstract

As digital health expanded during COVID-19, understanding how caregivers perceive differences between traditional and digital care became critical. In a purposive sample of female caregivers of school-age children with elevated mental health symptoms (n = 47), we used a convergent mixed-methods design to compare reported experiences across modalities. Thematic analysis revealed that participants described different barrier patterns: financial concerns were reported in both contexts, but with different characteristics (insurance/copays vs. device/subscription costs). Participants reported distinct digital challenges, relational connection loss, digital literacy gaps, and privacy concerns, while facilitators also differed. Traditional care narratives emphasized interpersonal support, while digital care highlighted accessibility and personalization. Social identity intersections were referenced more frequently in traditional care narratives, though demographic correlations suggested continued relevance in digital contexts. These pandemic-era findings from female caregivers generate hypotheses for designing inclusive digital health approaches and highlight areas for longitudinal research tracking actual transitions between care modalities.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
University of Southern California (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Florida International University (US), Systems & Materials Research Corporation (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.