Is Pearson’s correlation coefficient enough for functional connectivity in fMRI?

Functional connectivity (FC) is commonly defined as the temporal coincidence of neurophysiological events, often quantified by the statistical dependency among signals from different brain regions and measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient in fMRI. However, Pearson's r captures only linear dependencies, potentially overlooking nonlinear interactions. Recently, Multiscale Graph Correlation (MGC) was introduced to measure statistical dependencies of both linear and nonlinear relationships across multiple scales, offering an "optimal scale" at which such dependencies can be inferred. In this study, we systematically compared FC measurements by Pearson's r and MGC across datasets, evaluating their reliability, sensitivity to data quantity, and ability to capture distinct experimental conditions (deeper anesthesia in macaques) and brain-behavior association. Results showed highly similar spatial connectivity patterns and strong alignment between Pearson's r and MGC for within-network FC, where optimal scales were frequently global. However, local optimal scales emerged between networks, suggesting the presence of nonlinear dependencies of FC. Reliability was higher for Pearson's r overall, but both measurements improved as the quantity of data increased. Notably, MGC revealed variability in the optimal scales under altered brain states in deeper anesthesia, highlighting its potential for detecting local-scale dependencies across states. Despite these advantages, MGC required greater computational resources and did not outperform Pearson's r in detecting brain-behavior associations. Consequently, Pearson's r remains a sufficient and reliable measure for many standard applications, whereas MGC can offer more nuanced insights in scenarios where nonlinear dynamics are of particular interest. Researchers should, therefore, balance the potential gains from MGC against its added complexity and computational cost when selecting methods to quantify FC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1052
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Pearson’s correlation coefficient enough for functional connectivity in fMRI?

Gary Linn, Julian S.B. Ramirez, Arnaud Falchier, Hecheng Jin et al.
Imaging Neuroscience
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Is Pearson’s correlation coefficient enough for functional connectivity in fMRI?

Gary Linn, Julian S.B. Ramirez, Arnaud Falchier, Hecheng Jin, Michael Peter Milham, Kyoungseob Byeon, Gregory Kiar, Charles M. Schroeder, Joshua T Vogelstein, Brian E. Russ, Ting Xu
article en

Abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) is commonly defined as the temporal coincidence of neurophysiological events, often quantified by the statistical dependency among signals from different brain regions and measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient in fMRI. However, Pearson's r captures only linear dependencies, potentially overlooking nonlinear interactions. Recently, Multiscale Graph Correlation (MGC) was introduced to measure statistical dependencies of both linear and nonlinear relationships across multiple scales, offering an "optimal scale" at which such dependencies can be inferred. In this study, we systematically compared FC measurements by Pearson's r and MGC across datasets, evaluating their reliability, sensitivity to data quantity, and ability to capture distinct experimental conditions (deeper anesthesia in macaques) and brain-behavior association. Results showed highly similar spatial connectivity patterns and strong alignment between Pearson's r and MGC for within-network FC, where optimal scales were frequently global. However, local optimal scales emerged between networks, suggesting the presence of nonlinear dependencies of FC. Reliability was higher for Pearson's r overall, but both measurements improved as the quantity of data increased. Notably, MGC revealed variability in the optimal scales under altered brain states in deeper anesthesia, highlighting its potential for detecting local-scale dependencies across states. Despite these advantages, MGC required greater computational resources and did not outperform Pearson's r in detecting brain-behavior associations. Consequently, Pearson's r remains a sufficient and reliable measure for many standard applications, whereas MGC can offer more nuanced insights in scenarios where nonlinear dynamics are of particular interest. Researchers should, therefore, balance the potential gains from MGC against its added complexity and computational cost when selecting methods to quantify FC.

Imaging NeuroscienceVol. 3
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US), Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Child Mind Institute (US), Columbia University (US)
National Institutes of Health, McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.