Study - International multicentric minimally invasive liver resection (SIMMILR-4) : a comparison of conventional, digitally enhanced and collaborative robotic with Tele-robotic laparoscopic surgery for colorectal liver metastases

This international multicenter study compared five surgical approaches for resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): open, conventional laparoscopy (L), digitally enhanced laparoscopy with 3D imaging (DEL), collaborative robotic laparoscopy with a single robotic arm (CRL) with tele-robotic laparoscopic surgery with 3D imaging and 4 robotic arms (TRL). This exploratory study aimed to assess whether TRL liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) demonstrates potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy (L), digitally enhanced laparoscopy (DEL), or collaborative robotic laparoscopy (CRL). A retrospective analysis of 1,257 patients undergoing CRLM resection across five centers was performed. Surgical techniques were classified as O, L, DEL, CRL, or TRL. Because of limited case numbers in the DEL, CRL, and TRL groups, the primary comparison was between all minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cases combined (L, DEL, CRL, TRL; n = 283) and matched open controls (n = 283) using 1:1 propensity score matching. Outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), resection margin status (R0), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3). MIS demonstrated significantly lower EBL (505 mL vs. 692 mL, p < 0.0001) and shorter LOS (8 vs. 14 days, p < 0.0001) compared with open surgery. Subgroup analyses of DEL, CRL, and TRL (each < 21 patients post-match) showed comparable perioperative outcomes, suggesting incremental adoption of advanced technologies did not compromise safety or efficiency. MIS offers significant reductions in blood loss and hospital stay compared with open surgery. While TRL provides technical advantages, it did not show clear superiority. Prospective standardized multicenter studies are needed to confirm these exploratory findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03040-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study - International multicentric minimally invasive liver resection (SIMMILR-4) : a comparison of conventional, digitally enhanced and collaborative robotic with Tele-robotic laparoscopic surgery for colorectal liver metastases

Joseph Derienne, David Fuks, Vincent Grasso, Mohammad Abu Hilal et al.
1 citations
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
article

Study - International multicentric minimally invasive liver resection (SIMMILR-4) : a comparison of conventional, digitally enhanced and collaborative robotic with Tele-robotic laparoscopic surgery for colorectal liver metastases

Joseph Derienne, David Fuks, Vincent Grasso, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Hadrien Tranchart, Alireza Mohammadi, Roland S. Croner, Andrew A. Gumbs, Ibrahim Dagher, Karol Rawicz-Pruzynski, Zacharias Heger Londono, Soufyan El Abdel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This international multicenter study compared five surgical approaches for resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM): open, conventional laparoscopy (L), digitally enhanced laparoscopy with 3D imaging (DEL), collaborative robotic laparoscopy with a single robotic arm (CRL) with tele-robotic laparoscopic surgery with 3D imaging and 4 robotic arms (TRL). This exploratory study aimed to assess whether TRL liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) demonstrates potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy (L), digitally enhanced laparoscopy (DEL), or collaborative robotic laparoscopy (CRL). A retrospective analysis of 1,257 patients undergoing CRLM resection across five centers was performed. Surgical techniques were classified as O, L, DEL, CRL, or TRL. Because of limited case numbers in the DEL, CRL, and TRL groups, the primary comparison was between all minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cases combined (L, DEL, CRL, TRL; n = 283) and matched open controls (n = 283) using 1:1 propensity score matching. Outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), resection margin status (R0), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3). MIS demonstrated significantly lower EBL (505 mL vs. 692 mL, p < 0.0001) and shorter LOS (8 vs. 14 days, p < 0.0001) compared with open surgery. Subgroup analyses of DEL, CRL, and TRL (each < 21 patients post-match) showed comparable perioperative outcomes, suggesting incremental adoption of advanced technologies did not compromise safety or efficiency. MIS offers significant reductions in blood loss and hospital stay compared with open surgery. While TRL provides technical advantages, it did not show clear superiority. Prospective standardized multicenter studies are needed to confirm these exploratory findings.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
University of Jordan (JO), Medical University of Lublin (PL), University of New Mexico (US), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospital Magdeburg (DE), Hôpital Antoine-Béclère (FR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), Rowan University (US), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.