Annual nationwide cost estimation and short-term outcomes after para-aortic lymph node dissection for gynecologic malignancies according to surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic)
OLP remains predominant yet is clinically and economically inferior. CLS offers the best value where expertise exists, while RAS approximates CLS and markedly outperforms OLP, supporting its use as an alternative to OLP in centres that cannot sustain complex laparoscopy.
Authors
- Enrica Bentivegna
- Giuseppe Bifulco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1788-5170)
- Anne‐Sophie Bats (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-3296)
- Henri Azaïs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6855-9754)
- Meriem Koual
- Giuseppe D’Angelo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2962-6565)
- Huyên-Thu Nguyen-Xuan
- Cam Duong
Institutions
- Inserm (FR)
- Université Paris Cité (FR)
- Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers (FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Hôpital Européen (FR)
- Toxicologie, Pharmacologie et Signalisation Cellulaire (FR)
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Robotic Surgery
- Published
- 2025-12-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02978-y
- Primary Topic
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00