DETECTION OF OPHIDIOMYCES OPHIDIICOLA IN SAMPLES FROM FREE-RANGING SNAKES IN GERMANY, 2021–22

Ophidiomyces ophidiicola (Oo) is a fungus primarily affecting the skin of a wide range of snake species. Ophidiomyces ophidiicola has been found in snakes under human care as well as in free-ranging snakes, and the number of documented infections in free-ranging snakes from Europe is increasing. To better understand the distribution of Oo in snakes in Germany, 329 samples were collected from 328 free-ranging snakes from 47 different locations in Germany in 2021-22. Samples included swabs (n=188), shed skins (n=134), and carcasses (n=7) from six different species: 140 dice snakes (Natrix tessellata), 68 European common adders (Vipera berus), 62 Aesculapian snakes (Zamenis longissimus), 29 smooth snakes (Coronella austriaca), 17 whip snakes (Hierophis viridiflavus), and 12 grass snakes (Natrix natrix). Sampled animals were examined for the presence of skin lesions and samples were screened for Oo by real-time PCR (qPCR). Ophidiomyces ophidiicola was detected in 30/328 snakes (9.1%), including dice snakes (23/30, 77%), Aesculapian snakes (5/30, 17%), and grass snakes (2/30, 7%). No differences were found in the likelihood of detection of Oo between individual colubrid species, but colubrid snakes were significantly more likely to be Oo positive than were viperid snakes (Fisher's exact test, P=0.001). Skin lesions were observed in 37/328 snakes (11.3%), of which 8/37 (22%) were Oo positive by qPCR. Significant differences were found in Oo prevalences depending on the presence of skin lesions, and Oo positive snakes were more likely to have skin lesions compared to snakes that were Oo negative (OR=3.37 [95% confidence interval 1.38-8.26%; P<0.05]).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Diseases
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7589/jwd-d-25-00027
Primary Topic
Turtle Biology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DETECTION OF OPHIDIOMYCES OPHIDIICOLA IN SAMPLES FROM FREE-RANGING SNAKES IN GERMANY, 2021–22

Matthias Jurczyk, Michael Pees, Daniel W. Renner, Sigrid Lenz et al.
Journal of Wildlife Diseases
Turtle Biology and Conservation
article

DETECTION OF OPHIDIOMYCES OPHIDIICOLA IN SAMPLES FROM FREE-RANGING SNAKES IN GERMANY, 2021–22

Matthias Jurczyk, Michael Pees, Daniel W. Renner, Sigrid Lenz, Elisabeth Müller, Rachel E. Marschang, Paul Hien, Thomas Lindner, Karl Röhn, Lisa Schüler, H. Laufer
article en

Abstract

Ophidiomyces ophidiicola (Oo) is a fungus primarily affecting the skin of a wide range of snake species. Ophidiomyces ophidiicola has been found in snakes under human care as well as in free-ranging snakes, and the number of documented infections in free-ranging snakes from Europe is increasing. To better understand the distribution of Oo in snakes in Germany, 329 samples were collected from 328 free-ranging snakes from 47 different locations in Germany in 2021-22. Samples included swabs (n=188), shed skins (n=134), and carcasses (n=7) from six different species: 140 dice snakes (Natrix tessellata), 68 European common adders (Vipera berus), 62 Aesculapian snakes (Zamenis longissimus), 29 smooth snakes (Coronella austriaca), 17 whip snakes (Hierophis viridiflavus), and 12 grass snakes (Natrix natrix). Sampled animals were examined for the presence of skin lesions and samples were screened for Oo by real-time PCR (qPCR). Ophidiomyces ophidiicola was detected in 30/328 snakes (9.1%), including dice snakes (23/30, 77%), Aesculapian snakes (5/30, 17%), and grass snakes (2/30, 7%). No differences were found in the likelihood of detection of Oo between individual colubrid species, but colubrid snakes were significantly more likely to be Oo positive than were viperid snakes (Fisher's exact test, P=0.001). Skin lesions were observed in 37/328 snakes (11.3%), of which 8/37 (22%) were Oo positive by qPCR. Significant differences were found in Oo prevalences depending on the presence of skin lesions, and Oo positive snakes were more likely to have skin lesions compared to snakes that were Oo negative (OR=3.37 [95% confidence interval 1.38-8.26%; P<0.05]).

Journal of Wildlife DiseasesVol. 62(1)
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE), Laboklin (Germany) (DE), Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Steinhauser (Czechia) (CZ), Stadtwerke Straubing (Germany) (DE), Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Beratung (DE), University of Regensburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Turtle Biology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.