Comparison of Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Adaptations Induced by Back Squat and Leg Extension Resistance Exercises

Kassiano, W, Costa, B, Kunevaliki, G, Lisboa, F, Prado, A, Alves, L, Tricoli, I, Stavinski, N, Francssuel, J, and Cyrino, ES. Comparison of muscle hypertrophy and strength adaptations induced by back squat and leg extension resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 40(4): 367-376, 2026-Exercise selection affects muscular adaptations (e.g., strength gains and muscle hypertrophy). The purpose of this study was to compare changes in strength and muscle size between the back squat and leg extension resistance exercises. Sixty-three untrained young women were randomly allocated to perform the Smith machine back squat (SQ, n = 30) or leg extension (LE, n = 33) exercises. Subjects performed 3 sets of 8-12 repetitions maximum (RM) per session, 2 d·wk -1 , for 8 weeks. Muscle thickness of the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) was measured at the proximal, middle, and distal sites. Strength was assessed through 3 repetitions maximum (3RM) tests in the back squat (3RM-SQ) and leg extension (3RM-LE) exercises. The LE experienced greater increases in the 3 RF sites (proximal: +11.4% vs. +2.0%; middle: +12.3% vs. +5.7%; distal: 17.5% vs. +7.9%; all p < 0.001). Conversely, the SQ showed greater increases in VL at the distal site (+18.2% vs. +11.2%; p < 0.001). Smith machine back squat induced greater increases in 3RM-SQ (+46.7 vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001), but no between-group difference was observed in 3RM-LE increases (SQ = +19.8% vs. LE = +23.4%; p = 0.824). Based on our results, the leg extension induce greater rectus femoris hypertrophy, while the back squat promotes greater vastus lateralis hypertrophy, particularly at the distal site. The back squat training seems to be more effective for increasing squat strength, but both exercises are likely similarly effective for increasing leg extension strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005338
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Adaptations Induced by Back Squat and Leg Extension Resistance Exercises

Ian Tricoli, Gabriel Kunevaliki, Witalo Kassiano, Bruna Daniella de Vasconcelos Costa et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison of Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Adaptations Induced by Back Squat and Leg Extension Resistance Exercises

Ian Tricoli, Gabriel Kunevaliki, Witalo Kassiano, Bruna Daniella de Vasconcelos Costa, Natã Stavinski, Edílson Serpeloni Cyrino, Luis Gustavo Castro Alves, Jarlisson Francsuel, Felipe Lisboa, Aline Prado
article en

Abstract

Kassiano, W, Costa, B, Kunevaliki, G, Lisboa, F, Prado, A, Alves, L, Tricoli, I, Stavinski, N, Francssuel, J, and Cyrino, ES. Comparison of muscle hypertrophy and strength adaptations induced by back squat and leg extension resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 40(4): 367-376, 2026-Exercise selection affects muscular adaptations (e.g., strength gains and muscle hypertrophy). The purpose of this study was to compare changes in strength and muscle size between the back squat and leg extension resistance exercises. Sixty-three untrained young women were randomly allocated to perform the Smith machine back squat (SQ, n = 30) or leg extension (LE, n = 33) exercises. Subjects performed 3 sets of 8-12 repetitions maximum (RM) per session, 2 d·wk -1 , for 8 weeks. Muscle thickness of the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) was measured at the proximal, middle, and distal sites. Strength was assessed through 3 repetitions maximum (3RM) tests in the back squat (3RM-SQ) and leg extension (3RM-LE) exercises. The LE experienced greater increases in the 3 RF sites (proximal: +11.4% vs. +2.0%; middle: +12.3% vs. +5.7%; distal: 17.5% vs. +7.9%; all p < 0.001). Conversely, the SQ showed greater increases in VL at the distal site (+18.2% vs. +11.2%; p < 0.001). Smith machine back squat induced greater increases in 3RM-SQ (+46.7 vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001), but no between-group difference was observed in 3RM-LE increases (SQ = +19.8% vs. LE = +23.4%; p = 0.824). Based on our results, the leg extension induce greater rectus femoris hypertrophy, while the back squat promotes greater vastus lateralis hypertrophy, particularly at the distal site. The back squat training seems to be more effective for increasing squat strength, but both exercises are likely similarly effective for increasing leg extension strength.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(4)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Universidade Estadual do Paraná (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.