Prospects for Using Oyster Shells ( <scp> <i>Crassostrea gigas</i> </scp> ) and Plastic Waste (Polyethylene) in Lab‐Scale Vertical Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Swine Wastewater Treatment: Efficiency, Removal Pathways, and Economic Viabili

Replacing conventional filter media with recycled filters can enhance treatment efficiency and reduce the operational cost of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands (VSF CWs). This study evaluated the feasibility of using oyster shells (Crassostrea gigas) and polyethylene plastic waste as substitutes for traditional gravel media in VSF CWs treating swine wastewater. Seven media configurations were designed: CP1 (sand, small gravel [1 × 2 cm], and large gravel [3 × 5 cm]); CP2 and CP3 replaced small gravel with oyster shells and plastic waste, respectively; CP4, CP5, and CP6 used mixtures of oyster shells and plastics in varying volume ratios (1:3, 1:1, and 3:1, respectively); CP7 was a control system with no media. Four-month experiments were conducted at a laboratory scale, monitoring different hydraulic retention times (HRTs) (1, 2, 3, and 4 days) under two conditions: planted with Cyperus alternifolius and unplanted. Importantly, replacing conventional filter media with oyster shells and plastic waste did not adversely affect the growth of C. alternifolius in any of the experimental systems. The results showed that planted systems achieved 0.8%-28.7% higher removal efficiencies than unplanted ones (p < 0.05), with an optimal HRT of 2-3 days to meet QCVN 62-MT:2016/BTNMT Column B. CP1 consistently demonstrated the highest treatment efficiency. Meanwhile, CP2 and CP6 exhibited slightly lower removal efficiencies than CP1 but still achieved outstanding TP removal rates of over 70%. CP3 showed the lowest treatment performance. However, its effectiveness could be improved by blending with oyster shells at appropriate ratios. Among all experiments using recycled filter media, CP6 exhibited the most promising performance, with removal efficiencies for TSS, COD, TN, NH<sub>4</sub> <sup>+</sup>, and TP ranging from 62.6% to 87.6%, 36.1% to 77.2%, 30.8% to 74.0%, 33.6% to 85.3%, and 29.6% to 69.0%, respectively. Substituting small gravel with recycled plastic waste and oyster shells reduces material costs by three to four times, mitigates environmental pollution, and promotes solid waste recycling toward a circular economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Environment Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70241
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospects for Using Oyster Shells ( Crassostrea gigas ) and Plastic Waste (Polyethylene) in Lab‐Scale Vertical Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Swine Wastewater Treatment: Efficiency, Removal Pathways, and Economic Viabili

Bui Quoc Lap, Bùi Thị Kim Anh, Ngo Dang Phong, La Duc Duong et al.
3 citations
Water Environment Research
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
2.99
article

Prospects for Using Oyster Shells ( Crassostrea gigas ) and Plastic Waste (Polyethylene) in Lab‐Scale Vertical Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Swine Wastewater Treatment: Efficiency, Removal Pathways, and Economic Viabili

Bui Quoc Lap, Bùi Thị Kim Anh, Ngo Dang Phong, La Duc Duong, Nguyen Thi Hoang Ha, Nguyen Hong Yen, Vũ Ngọc Toán, Nguyen Hong Chuyen, Nguyễn Văn Thành, Nguyen Thi An Hang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Replacing conventional filter media with recycled filters can enhance treatment efficiency and reduce the operational cost of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands (VSF CWs). This study evaluated the feasibility of using oyster shells (Crassostrea gigas) and polyethylene plastic waste as substitutes for traditional gravel media in VSF CWs treating swine wastewater. Seven media configurations were designed: CP1 (sand, small gravel [1 × 2 cm], and large gravel [3 × 5 cm]); CP2 and CP3 replaced small gravel with oyster shells and plastic waste, respectively; CP4, CP5, and CP6 used mixtures of oyster shells and plastics in varying volume ratios (1:3, 1:1, and 3:1, respectively); CP7 was a control system with no media. Four-month experiments were conducted at a laboratory scale, monitoring different hydraulic retention times (HRTs) (1, 2, 3, and 4 days) under two conditions: planted with Cyperus alternifolius and unplanted. Importantly, replacing conventional filter media with oyster shells and plastic waste did not adversely affect the growth of C. alternifolius in any of the experimental systems. The results showed that planted systems achieved 0.8%-28.7% higher removal efficiencies than unplanted ones (p < 0.05), with an optimal HRT of 2-3 days to meet QCVN 62-MT:2016/BTNMT Column B. CP1 consistently demonstrated the highest treatment efficiency. Meanwhile, CP2 and CP6 exhibited slightly lower removal efficiencies than CP1 but still achieved outstanding TP removal rates of over 70%. CP3 showed the lowest treatment performance. However, its effectiveness could be improved by blending with oyster shells at appropriate ratios. Among all experiments using recycled filter media, CP6 exhibited the most promising performance, with removal efficiencies for TSS, COD, TN, NH<sub>4</sub> <sup>+</sup>, and TP ranging from 62.6% to 87.6%, 36.1% to 77.2%, 30.8% to 74.0%, 33.6% to 85.3%, and 29.6% to 69.0%, respectively. Substituting small gravel with recycled plastic waste and oyster shells reduces material costs by three to four times, mitigates environmental pollution, and promotes solid waste recycling toward a circular economy.

Water Environment ResearchVol. 97(12)
Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VN), Thuyloi University (VN), Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (VN), Vietnam Military Medical University (VN), Institute of Mathematics (VN), Institute for Studies of Society, Economy and Environment (VN), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
2.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.