Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline in Critically Ill Patients and Optimal Dosage Regimens With Dose Simulations Based on Infection Type and Renal Function

Background The present study was conducted to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model that describes tigecycline concentrations in critically ill patients and optimises the detailed dosing regimens of tigecycline via Monte Carlo simulations. Methods A single‐centre, prospective, observational study was conducted on 155 patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit (ICU) with 458 plasma samples. This work enrolled 115 eligible patients (348 plasma samples) to establish the population PK model with various covariates and the other 40 patients (110 plasma samples) were validated on such a model. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of proposal dosage regimens. Results The two‐compartment model of zero‐order absorption and first‐order elimination can be used to fully describe the concentration–time curve of tigecycline. The estimated values of population PK parameters were 16.3 and 40.7 L/h for clearance (CL) and Q , respectively, and 145 and 345 L for the volumes of the central and peripheral compartments. Creatinine clearance (CrCL) was the only factor that exhibited a relation to systemic CL in the final PK model, with a CrCL adjustment factor of 0.00692. According to dose simulations, the standard dosage regimen only sufficed for pneumonia patients with a low value of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC = 0.25 mg/L) or renal dysfunction (MIC ≤ 1 mg/L, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). High doses of tigecycline were needed in such patients with a high MIC or a normal/high renal CL rate. For complicated intra‐abdominal infections, the standard dose can achieve a high PTA when MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L and under nonaugmented renal CL conditions. For complicated skin‐structure infections, the standard dose can only achieve the expected therapeutic effect for patients with MIC = 0.25 mg/L and renal dysfunction (eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Conclusion The recommended standard dosage regimen of tigecycline is insufficient for most critically ill patients. This study provides detailed dose regimens of tigecycline for ICU patients based on infection type and renal function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jcpt/6889748
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline in Critically Ill Patients and Optimal Dosage Regimens With Dose Simulations Based on Infection Type and Renal Function

Yunpeng Bai, Jingchun Chen, Jie Zhu, Chunbo Chen et al.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline in Critically Ill Patients and Optimal Dosage Regimens With Dose Simulations Based on Infection Type and Renal Function

Yunpeng Bai, Jingchun Chen, Jie Zhu, Chunbo Chen, Xipei Wang, Jianglin Li, Feng Wang, Wendong Huang, Xiao Wang, Wenting Li, Xin Liu, Yirong Wang, Fen Yao
article en

Abstract

Background The present study was conducted to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model that describes tigecycline concentrations in critically ill patients and optimises the detailed dosing regimens of tigecycline via Monte Carlo simulations. Methods A single‐centre, prospective, observational study was conducted on 155 patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit (ICU) with 458 plasma samples. This work enrolled 115 eligible patients (348 plasma samples) to establish the population PK model with various covariates and the other 40 patients (110 plasma samples) were validated on such a model. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of proposal dosage regimens. Results The two‐compartment model of zero‐order absorption and first‐order elimination can be used to fully describe the concentration–time curve of tigecycline. The estimated values of population PK parameters were 16.3 and 40.7 L/h for clearance (CL) and Q , respectively, and 145 and 345 L for the volumes of the central and peripheral compartments. Creatinine clearance (CrCL) was the only factor that exhibited a relation to systemic CL in the final PK model, with a CrCL adjustment factor of 0.00692. According to dose simulations, the standard dosage regimen only sufficed for pneumonia patients with a low value of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC = 0.25 mg/L) or renal dysfunction (MIC ≤ 1 mg/L, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). High doses of tigecycline were needed in such patients with a high MIC or a normal/high renal CL rate. For complicated intra‐abdominal infections, the standard dose can achieve a high PTA when MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L and under nonaugmented renal CL conditions. For complicated skin‐structure infections, the standard dose can only achieve the expected therapeutic effect for patients with MIC = 0.25 mg/L and renal dysfunction (eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Conclusion The recommended standard dosage regimen of tigecycline is insufficient for most critically ill patients. This study provides detailed dose regimens of tigecycline for ICU patients based on infection type and renal function.

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and TherapeuticsVol. 2025(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Beihai People's Hospital (CN), Boxing People's Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Shenzhen Children's Hospital (CN), Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (CN), Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
China International Medical Foundation, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.