Assessment of empirical and physically-based approaches to simulate surface resistance for improved evapotranspiration modeling of winter wheat in semi-arid region, Morocco

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a fundamental component of the water and energy balance, strongly influencing crop growth and productivity. Accurate ET estimation is critical in semi-arid regions, where water scarcity requires optimized management. Among the available approaches, the Penman–Monteith (PM) model is the most widely used for this purpose, its performance strongly depends on the accurate characterization of surface resistance ( r c ), a key parameter controlling ET estimations. In this study, two approaches for estimating r c were evaluated for winter wheat cultivated in the Haouz plain (Morocco) under contrasting irrigation regimes (full and deficit) during the 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 growing seasons. The first is a mechanistic formulation, based on the Jarvis model, which incorporates vapor pressure deficit ( VPD ) and soil water content ( θ ) to capture stomatal responses. The second is an empirical approach, using a thermal stress index ( SI ) derived from land surface temperature ( LST ), providing a rapid indicator of crop water status. Both approaches were integrated into the PM model and calibrated with eddy covariance data collected over a deficit-irrigated field in 2016/2017, then validated across both irrigation regimes and seasons. Results showed that the mechanistic approach reproduced ET dynamics under full irrigation (R² ≥ 0.73; RMSE < 0.6 mm·day⁻¹), but underestimated fluxes under severe stress. Conversely, the empirical approach, being more sensitive to short-term water status, outperformed under deficit irrigation (R² ≥ 0.79; RMSE < 0.6 mm·day⁻¹). Moreover, a critical SI threshold of 0.5 was identified, which could serve as a practical guideline for irrigation scheduling to reduce water losses. Overall, the results highlight the robustness and complementarity of both approaches and suggest the potential of hybrid models combining physiological realism with thermal sensitivity to improve irrigation management in water-limited areas. • Mechanistic and empirical approaches used to estimate canopy resistance. • The two approaches show complementarity across irrigation regimes. • Full irrigation, the mechanistic model performs best in reproducing ET (R²≥0.73). • Deficit irrigation, the empirical model performs best in reproducing ET (R²≥0.79). • SI 0.5 threshold provides a practical guideline for irrigation timing in wheat fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.110066
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of empirical and physically-based approaches to simulate surface resistance for improved evapotranspiration modeling of winter wheat in semi-arid region, Morocco

Hazem Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed, Jamal Ezzahar, Saïd Khabba, Abdelhakim Amazirh et al.
Agricultural Water Management
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Assessment of empirical and physically-based approaches to simulate surface resistance for improved evapotranspiration modeling of winter wheat in semi-arid region, Morocco

Hazem Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed, Jamal Ezzahar, Saïd Khabba, Abdelhakim Amazirh, A. Chehbouni, Salah Er‐Raki, Lamia Jallal, Zaineb Bouswir
article en

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a fundamental component of the water and energy balance, strongly influencing crop growth and productivity. Accurate ET estimation is critical in semi-arid regions, where water scarcity requires optimized management. Among the available approaches, the Penman–Monteith (PM) model is the most widely used for this purpose, its performance strongly depends on the accurate characterization of surface resistance ( r c ), a key parameter controlling ET estimations. In this study, two approaches for estimating r c were evaluated for winter wheat cultivated in the Haouz plain (Morocco) under contrasting irrigation regimes (full and deficit) during the 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 growing seasons. The first is a mechanistic formulation, based on the Jarvis model, which incorporates vapor pressure deficit ( VPD ) and soil water content ( θ ) to capture stomatal responses. The second is an empirical approach, using a thermal stress index ( SI ) derived from land surface temperature ( LST ), providing a rapid indicator of crop water status. Both approaches were integrated into the PM model and calibrated with eddy covariance data collected over a deficit-irrigated field in 2016/2017, then validated across both irrigation regimes and seasons. Results showed that the mechanistic approach reproduced ET dynamics under full irrigation (R² ≥ 0.73; RMSE < 0.6 mm·day⁻¹), but underestimated fluxes under severe stress. Conversely, the empirical approach, being more sensitive to short-term water status, outperformed under deficit irrigation (R² ≥ 0.79; RMSE < 0.6 mm·day⁻¹). Moreover, a critical SI threshold of 0.5 was identified, which could serve as a practical guideline for irrigation scheduling to reduce water losses. Overall, the results highlight the robustness and complementarity of both approaches and suggest the potential of hybrid models combining physiological realism with thermal sensitivity to improve irrigation management in water-limited areas. • Mechanistic and empirical approaches used to estimate canopy resistance. • The two approaches show complementarity across irrigation regimes. • Full irrigation, the mechanistic model performs best in reproducing ET (R²≥0.73). • Deficit irrigation, the empirical model performs best in reproducing ET (R²≥0.79). • SI 0.5 threshold provides a practical guideline for irrigation timing in wheat fields.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 323
Cadi Ayyad University (MA), Center For Remote Sensing (United States) (US), Saft (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.