Vitrification of Immature Bovine Oocytes Using Two Protocols Containing Ice Blockers: Effects on Oocyte Quality
<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This study compared the synthetic polymer (SP) and the antifreeze protein type 3 (AFP3) protocols for the vitrification of bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Fresh bovine COCs were subjected to <i>in vitro</i> maturation (IVM) for 24 hours, while other COCs were vitrified using the SP or AFP protocols. After vitrification and warming, the COCs were subjected to IVM for 24 hours. Both fresh and vitrified COCs were analyzed for chromatin status, mitochondrial activity, reactive oxygen species levels, integrity of TZPs, DNA damage, and the expression of <i>MPS1</i>, <i>BUB1</i>, <i>MAD1</i>, <i>CX43</i>, and <i>ZP3</i>. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The metaphase II (MII) rates of COCs vitrified with SPp (38%) were significantly higher than those vitrified with AFP3p (10%) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The fluorescence intensity for CM-H<sub>2</sub>DCFDA (30 ± 3.2) and nitrite/nitrate levels (10.6 ± 1.6) were higher in AFP3p COCs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The transzonal projections (TZPs) of SPp COCs were intact and showed less DNA damage (25 ± 1.15) compared with those of AFP3p (43 ± 3.9) COCs (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The expression of the <i>MPS1</i> (SPp 0.3 ± 0.4; AFP3p 0.07 ± 0.06) and <i>BUB1</i> (SPp: 0.2 ± 0.4; AFP3p 0.005 ± 0.005) genes was higher in vitrified COCs compared with fresh control COCs (0.001 ± 0.0006; 0.001 ± 4.0) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). On the other hand, the <i>MAD1</i>, <i>CX43</i>, and <i>ZP3</i> genes were expressed only in fresh oocytes. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Under the conditions tested, SPp was the most suitable protocol for vitrifying bovine COCs, guaranteeing good MII rates, maintaining TZP integrity and reducing DNA damage.
Authors
- Éverton Pimentel Ferreira Lopes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1250-4818)
- Gildas Mbemya Tetaping (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-362X)
- Naíza Arcângela Ribeiro de Sá (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4745-0108)
- J.R. Figueiredo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-0964)
- Gaby Judith Quispe Palomino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-0536)
- Lucy Vanessa Sulca Ñaupas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7306)
- Vicente José de Figueirêdo Freitas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-0880)
- Ana Normélia Pereira de Morais
- Anna Clara Accioly Ferreira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-9471)
- Bruno Coêlho Cavalcanti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0725-8392)
- Wesley Lyeverton Correia Ribeiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2784-0013)
- Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9777-2530)
- Gonçalo Vale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1104-0289)
- Cláudia Pessoa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4344-4336)
- Ana Paula Ribeiro Rodrigues
Institutions
- Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Biopreservation and Biobanking
- Published
- 2025-12-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/19475535251400153
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00