Delayed start of estetrol drospirenone versus ethinyl estradiol gestodene for ovulation inhibition in a noninferiority randomized controlled trial

Delayed-start contraception may reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy; however, data on newer formulations, such as estetrol (E4)-containing pills are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of delayed start combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing 15 mg E4 and 3 mg drospirenone (E4/DRSP). In this randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, 36 healthy women aged 18-45 years with regular menstrual cycles were assigned to receive either E4/DRSP or 20 µg ethinyl estradiol/75 µg gestodene (EE/GS), starting treatment between cycle day 7 and 9. The primary outcome was ovulation inhibition, assessed using the modified Hoogland score. The secondary outcomes included cervical mucus changes and adverse effects. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. The mean age and menstrual cycle length were 38.75 ± 5.8 years and 28.67 ± 1.96 days, respectively. More than half (55.56%) of the participants began COC use on day 9, with 50% of them showing active follicular development at baseline (Hoogland score of 4). Ovulation was inhibited in 61.11% of participants in both groups (adjusted relative risks: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-1.59, p = 0.841, and absolute risk difference: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.39 to 0.33). Approximately half of the participants who ovulated showed ovarian activity that was not associated with theoretical pregnancy risk. Cervical mucus profiles and adverse events, including unscheduled bleeding, did not differ significantly between the groups. Initiating E4/DRSP on cycle day 7-9 appears comparable to that of EE/GS for ovulation inhibition; however, high ovulation rates limit the confirmation of non-inferiority.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration on April 25, 2024 (ID: NCT06396221; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06396221 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27467-y
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delayed start of estetrol drospirenone versus ethinyl estradiol gestodene for ovulation inhibition in a noninferiority randomized controlled trial

Sutira Uaamnuichai, Somsook Santibenchakul, Phanupong Phutrakool, Rachanee Wongwathanavikrom et al.
Scientific Reports
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Delayed start of estetrol drospirenone versus ethinyl estradiol gestodene for ovulation inhibition in a noninferiority randomized controlled trial

Sutira Uaamnuichai, Somsook Santibenchakul, Phanupong Phutrakool, Rachanee Wongwathanavikrom, Sirarat Ittipuripat, Gade Porntawansak, Punyawee Utaipatanacheep
article en

Abstract

Delayed-start contraception may reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy; however, data on newer formulations, such as estetrol (E4)-containing pills are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of delayed start combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing 15 mg E4 and 3 mg drospirenone (E4/DRSP). In this randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, 36 healthy women aged 18-45 years with regular menstrual cycles were assigned to receive either E4/DRSP or 20 µg ethinyl estradiol/75 µg gestodene (EE/GS), starting treatment between cycle day 7 and 9. The primary outcome was ovulation inhibition, assessed using the modified Hoogland score. The secondary outcomes included cervical mucus changes and adverse effects. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. The mean age and menstrual cycle length were 38.75 ± 5.8 years and 28.67 ± 1.96 days, respectively. More than half (55.56%) of the participants began COC use on day 9, with 50% of them showing active follicular development at baseline (Hoogland score of 4). Ovulation was inhibited in 61.11% of participants in both groups (adjusted relative risks: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-1.59, p = 0.841, and absolute risk difference: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.39 to 0.33). Approximately half of the participants who ovulated showed ovarian activity that was not associated with theoretical pregnancy risk. Cervical mucus profiles and adverse events, including unscheduled bleeding, did not differ significantly between the groups. Initiating E4/DRSP on cycle day 7-9 appears comparable to that of EE/GS for ovulation inhibition; however, high ovulation rates limit the confirmation of non-inferiority.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration on April 25, 2024 (ID: NCT06396221; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06396221 ).

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH)
Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.