Cross-Cancer Transfer Learning for Gastric Cancer Risk Prediction from Electronic Health Records

<b>Background</b>: Timely identification of individuals at elevated risk for gastric cancer (GC) within routine care could enable earlier endoscopy and referral. We posit that cancers within the gastrointestinal/hepatopancreatobiliary spectrum share signals that can be leveraged via transfer learning on electronic health records (EHRs) variables. <b>Methods</b>: We developed a cross-cancer transfer learning framework (TransferGC) on structured EHR data from the MIMIC-IV database, including 508 GC cases in the target cohort, that pretrains on non-gastric gastrointestinal/hepatopancreatobiliary cancers (colorectal, esophageal, liver, pancreatic) and then adapts to GC using only structured variables. We compared transfer variants against strong non-transfer baselines (logistic regression, XGBoost, architecturally matched multilayer perceptron), with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and average precision (AP) as primary endpoints and F1 and sensitivity/specificity as secondary endpoints. <b>Results</b>: In the full-label setting, Transfer achieved AUROC 0.854 and AP 0.600, outperforming logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and improving over the scratch multilayer perceptron (MLP) in AUROC (+0.024) and F1 (+0.027), while AP was essentially tied (Transfer 0.600 vs. MLP 0.603). As GC labels were reduced, Transfer maintained the strongest overall performance. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cross-cancer transfer on structured EHR data suggests a sample-efficient route to GC risk modeling under label scarcity. However, because all models were developed and evaluated using a single-center inpatient dataset, external validation on multi-center and outpatient cohorts will be essential to establish generalizability before deployment. If confirmed in future studies, the proposed framework could be integrated into EHR-based triage and clinical decision support workflows to flag patients at elevated GC risk for timely endoscopy and specialist referral.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243175
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Cancer Transfer Learning for Gastric Cancer Risk Prediction from Electronic Health Records

Daeyoung Hong, Jiyong Jung, J Kim
Diagnostics
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Cross-Cancer Transfer Learning for Gastric Cancer Risk Prediction from Electronic Health Records

Daeyoung Hong, Jiyong Jung, J Kim
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Timely identification of individuals at elevated risk for gastric cancer (GC) within routine care could enable earlier endoscopy and referral. We posit that cancers within the gastrointestinal/hepatopancreatobiliary spectrum share signals that can be leveraged via transfer learning on electronic health records (EHRs) variables. <b>Methods</b>: We developed a cross-cancer transfer learning framework (TransferGC) on structured EHR data from the MIMIC-IV database, including 508 GC cases in the target cohort, that pretrains on non-gastric gastrointestinal/hepatopancreatobiliary cancers (colorectal, esophageal, liver, pancreatic) and then adapts to GC using only structured variables. We compared transfer variants against strong non-transfer baselines (logistic regression, XGBoost, architecturally matched multilayer perceptron), with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and average precision (AP) as primary endpoints and F1 and sensitivity/specificity as secondary endpoints. <b>Results</b>: In the full-label setting, Transfer achieved AUROC 0.854 and AP 0.600, outperforming logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and improving over the scratch multilayer perceptron (MLP) in AUROC (+0.024) and F1 (+0.027), while AP was essentially tied (Transfer 0.600 vs. MLP 0.603). As GC labels were reduced, Transfer maintained the strongest overall performance. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cross-cancer transfer on structured EHR data suggests a sample-efficient route to GC risk modeling under label scarcity. However, because all models were developed and evaluated using a single-center inpatient dataset, external validation on multi-center and outpatient cohorts will be essential to establish generalizability before deployment. If confirmed in future studies, the proposed framework could be integrated into EHR-based triage and clinical decision support workflows to flag patients at elevated GC risk for timely endoscopy and specialist referral.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(24)
Myongji University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.