Mixed Layer and Oceanic Kelvin Wave Response Biases to Equatorial Pacific Westerly Wind Events in CMIP6 Models

Abstract This study explores the biases in westerly wind events (WWEs) and their induced oceanic Kelvin waves (OKWs) in seven CMIP6 models from three modeling centers that provide daily thermocline depth output. Among the WWEs and OKWs identified in historical simulations, WWEs are generally weaker than observed for a given OKW response, suggesting that OKWs in models respond too strongly to WWE forcing. The equatorial ocean mixed layers in the models are generally too thin and overly stratified compared to observations. These biases may help inhibit the turbulence‐induced mixed layer deepening and trap the WWE‐provided momentum within the ocean surface layers. Thus, they support an exaggerated sea surface height buildup and thermocline deepening in OKW initiation regions, which leads to an overly strong OKW response. These biases may be associated with a too‐strong net heat flux between the atmosphere and the ocean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jc023275
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed Layer and Oceanic Kelvin Wave Response Biases to Equatorial Pacific Westerly Wind Events in CMIP6 Models

Emily M. Riley Dellaripa, Charlotte A. DeMott, Eric Daniel Maloney, Jingxuan Cui
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
article

Mixed Layer and Oceanic Kelvin Wave Response Biases to Equatorial Pacific Westerly Wind Events in CMIP6 Models

Emily M. Riley Dellaripa, Charlotte A. DeMott, Eric Daniel Maloney, Jingxuan Cui
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the biases in westerly wind events (WWEs) and their induced oceanic Kelvin waves (OKWs) in seven CMIP6 models from three modeling centers that provide daily thermocline depth output. Among the WWEs and OKWs identified in historical simulations, WWEs are generally weaker than observed for a given OKW response, suggesting that OKWs in models respond too strongly to WWE forcing. The equatorial ocean mixed layers in the models are generally too thin and overly stratified compared to observations. These biases may help inhibit the turbulence‐induced mixed layer deepening and trap the WWE‐provided momentum within the ocean surface layers. Thus, they support an exaggerated sea surface height buildup and thermocline deepening in OKW initiation regions, which leads to an overly strong OKW response. These biases may be associated with a too‐strong net heat flux between the atmosphere and the ocean.

Journal of Geophysical Research OceansVol. 130(12)
Colorado State University (US)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.