Utilizing Geoparsing for Mapping Natural Hazards in Europe

Natural hazards exert a detrimental influence on human survival, environmental conditions and society. Historical hazard events have generated a broad corpus of literature addressing the spatiotemporal extent, dissemination or social responses. With regard to quantitative analysis based on information locked within verbose text, the release of such information from the narrative format is encouraging. Natural Language Processing (NLP), a technique demonstrated to be capable of automated data extraction, provides a useful tool in establishing a structured dataset on hazard occurrences. In our study, we utilize scattered textual records of historical natural hazard events to create a novel dataset and explore the applicability of NLP in parallel. We put forward a standard list of toponyms based on manual annotation of a compilation of disaster-related texts, all of which were references in an authoritative publication in the field. The final natural hazards dataset comprised location data, which referred to a specific hazard report in Europe during 1301–1500, together with its geocoding result, year of occurrence and detailed event(s). We evaluated the performance of four pre-trained geoparsing tools (Flair, Stanford CoreNLP, spaCy and Irchel Geoparser) for automated toponym extraction in comparion with the standard list. All four tested methods showed a high precision (above 0.99). Flair had the best overall performance (F1 score 0.89), followed by Stanford CoreNLP (F1 score 0.83) and Irchel Geoparser (F1 score 0.82), while spaCy had a poor recall (0.5). Then we divided natural hazards into six categories: extreme heat, snow and ice, wind and hails, rainstorms and floods, droughts, and earthquakes. Finally, we compared our newly digitized natural hazard dataset to a geocoded version of the dataset provided by Harvard University, thus providing a comprehensive overview of the spatial–temporal characteristics of European hazard observations. The statistical outcomes of the present investigation demonstrate the efficacy of NLP techniques in text information extraction and hazard dataset generation, offering references for collaborative and interdisciplinary efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243520
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilizing Geoparsing for Mapping Natural Hazards in Europe

Xuezhen Zhang, Tao Yu, Jun Yin
Water
Geographic Information Systems Studies
article

Utilizing Geoparsing for Mapping Natural Hazards in Europe

Xuezhen Zhang, Tao Yu, Jun Yin
article en

Abstract

Natural hazards exert a detrimental influence on human survival, environmental conditions and society. Historical hazard events have generated a broad corpus of literature addressing the spatiotemporal extent, dissemination or social responses. With regard to quantitative analysis based on information locked within verbose text, the release of such information from the narrative format is encouraging. Natural Language Processing (NLP), a technique demonstrated to be capable of automated data extraction, provides a useful tool in establishing a structured dataset on hazard occurrences. In our study, we utilize scattered textual records of historical natural hazard events to create a novel dataset and explore the applicability of NLP in parallel. We put forward a standard list of toponyms based on manual annotation of a compilation of disaster-related texts, all of which were references in an authoritative publication in the field. The final natural hazards dataset comprised location data, which referred to a specific hazard report in Europe during 1301–1500, together with its geocoding result, year of occurrence and detailed event(s). We evaluated the performance of four pre-trained geoparsing tools (Flair, Stanford CoreNLP, spaCy and Irchel Geoparser) for automated toponym extraction in comparion with the standard list. All four tested methods showed a high precision (above 0.99). Flair had the best overall performance (F1 score 0.89), followed by Stanford CoreNLP (F1 score 0.83) and Irchel Geoparser (F1 score 0.82), while spaCy had a poor recall (0.5). Then we divided natural hazards into six categories: extreme heat, snow and ice, wind and hails, rainstorms and floods, droughts, and earthquakes. Finally, we compared our newly digitized natural hazard dataset to a geocoded version of the dataset provided by Harvard University, thus providing a comprehensive overview of the spatial–temporal characteristics of European hazard observations. The statistical outcomes of the present investigation demonstrate the efficacy of NLP techniques in text information extraction and hazard dataset generation, offering references for collaborative and interdisciplinary efforts.

WaterVol. 17(24)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.