Who chooses to engage? Understanding the characteristics of physicians who voluntarily engage with an audit and feedback intervention: a retrospective cohort study

To expand A&F's reach and impact, future efforts should (1) tailor outreach to physicians with larger, more diverse practice populations, (2) seek to understand why physicians with higher perceived need for change engage less, (3) understand which physicians are most likely to benefit and (4) co-design how to make A&F more relevant and actionable for those serving marginalised communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Quality & Safety
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019490
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who chooses to engage? Understanding the characteristics of physicians who voluntarily engage with an audit and feedback intervention: a retrospective cohort study

Laura Desveaux, Mina Tadrous, Cenap Güngör, Noah Ivers et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety
Healthcare Quality and Management
article

Who chooses to engage? Understanding the characteristics of physicians who voluntarily engage with an audit and feedback intervention: a retrospective cohort study

Laura Desveaux, Mina Tadrous, Cenap Güngör, Noah Ivers, Geneviève Rouleau, Cherry Chu, Braeden A. Terpou
article en

Abstract

To expand A&F's reach and impact, future efforts should (1) tailor outreach to physicians with larger, more diverse practice populations, (2) seek to understand why physicians with higher perceived need for change engage less, (3) understand which physicians are most likely to benefit and (4) co-design how to make A&F more relevant and actionable for those serving marginalised communities.

BMJ Quality & Safety
University of Toronto (CA), Trillium Health Centre (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Healthcare Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.