OUTCOMES OF FUNCTIONAL VERSUS MECHANICAL ALIGNMENT IN ROBOTIC ARM-ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Introduction Mechanically aligned (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold standard; however, some patients continue to report post- surgical dissatisfaction. An alternative is Functional alignment (FA), which integrates kinematic alignment (KA) principles with pre- resection bone balancing within defined boundaries. FA aims to improve outcomes by restoring native joint lines and optimising soft-tissue balance. There is limited comparative evidence between the two procedures. Methods A prospective, randomised controlled trial compared MA (n=121) and FA (n=123) using robotic-assisted TKA. MA components were positioned perpendicular to the limb mechanical axis, and balance achieved with soft-tissue releases. For FA, initial virtual component positioning was matched with native knee anatomy, with soft-tissue adjustments prior to bone cuts. A mixed-model analysis of variance was performed to compare outcomes. The primary outcome was the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Results At two-years, mean FJS for both procedures were similar (MA: 64.4±30.1 vs. FA: 70.1±25.6, p=0.10). More soft-tissue releases were performed in MA than FA (65% vs. 16%, p<0.001). FA patients had higher Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Symptoms (86.6±12.9 vs. 82.5±14.0, p=0.01) and Quality of Life (QOL) scores (76.1±20.3 vs. 70.7±22.7, p=0.03), and more ‘would recommend’ the procedure (94% vs. 82%, p<0.01) compared with MA. For constitutionally varus knees (Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Type I), FA patients reported higher FJS (71.3±24.8 vs. 56.8±31.6, p=0.02) and KOOS-QOL (76.4±21.7 vs. 64.2±19.2, p=0.02) than MA. Both procedures had similar patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Score, KOOS, EuroQol-5 Dimensions, Pain Visual Analog Scale), clinical outcomes (length of stay, functional physio tests), reoperations, and implant survivorship (FA: 1 vs. MA: 0 revisions). Conclusions FA required fewer soft-tissue releases compared with MA, however outcomes at two years were similar. FA may provide improved outcomes for a particular subgroup of patients based on preoperative alignments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.16.024
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OUTCOMES OF FUNCTIONAL VERSUS MECHANICAL ALIGNMENT IN ROBOTIC ARM-ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Matthew Walker, Rupert van Rooyen, Mei Lin Tay, Simon W. Young et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

OUTCOMES OF FUNCTIONAL VERSUS MECHANICAL ALIGNMENT IN ROBOTIC ARM-ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Matthew Walker, Rupert van Rooyen, Mei Lin Tay, Simon W. Young, Ali Bayan, Bill Farrington, Kohei Kawaguchi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Mechanically aligned (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold standard; however, some patients continue to report post- surgical dissatisfaction. An alternative is Functional alignment (FA), which integrates kinematic alignment (KA) principles with pre- resection bone balancing within defined boundaries. FA aims to improve outcomes by restoring native joint lines and optimising soft-tissue balance. There is limited comparative evidence between the two procedures. Methods A prospective, randomised controlled trial compared MA (n=121) and FA (n=123) using robotic-assisted TKA. MA components were positioned perpendicular to the limb mechanical axis, and balance achieved with soft-tissue releases. For FA, initial virtual component positioning was matched with native knee anatomy, with soft-tissue adjustments prior to bone cuts. A mixed-model analysis of variance was performed to compare outcomes. The primary outcome was the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Results At two-years, mean FJS for both procedures were similar (MA: 64.4±30.1 vs. FA: 70.1±25.6, p=0.10). More soft-tissue releases were performed in MA than FA (65% vs. 16%, p<0.001). FA patients had higher Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Symptoms (86.6±12.9 vs. 82.5±14.0, p=0.01) and Quality of Life (QOL) scores (76.1±20.3 vs. 70.7±22.7, p=0.03), and more ‘would recommend’ the procedure (94% vs. 82%, p<0.01) compared with MA. For constitutionally varus knees (Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Type I), FA patients reported higher FJS (71.3±24.8 vs. 56.8±31.6, p=0.02) and KOOS-QOL (76.4±21.7 vs. 64.2±19.2, p=0.02) than MA. Both procedures had similar patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Score, KOOS, EuroQol-5 Dimensions, Pain Visual Analog Scale), clinical outcomes (length of stay, functional physio tests), reoperations, and implant survivorship (FA: 1 vs. MA: 0 revisions). Conclusions FA required fewer soft-tissue releases compared with MA, however outcomes at two years were similar. FA may provide improved outcomes for a particular subgroup of patients based on preoperative alignments.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_16)
North Shore Hospital (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.