Official estimates of global food insecurity undercount acute hunger

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system is the official global method for classifying food insecurity. As of 2023, international agencies and governments use IPC analyses to allocate more than US$6 billion of humanitarian assistance annually. Here we evaluate data from approximately 1 billion people in more than 10,000 IPC subnational analyses conducted between 2017 and 2023. We find that IPC estimates understate the extent and severity of crises. Our primary estimates indicate that IPC subnational analyses underestimate the number of acutely hungry people in the world, missing approximately one in five. We find evidence of under-classification around the IPC threshold that determines whether an area is classified as 'stressed' or 'in crisis'-a threshold meant to trigger deployment of humanitarian resources. Contrary to widely held assumptions, our findings suggest that IPC analyses are conservative; the prevalence and severity of acute hunger is probably considerably higher than global estimates indicate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Food
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01267-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Official estimates of global food insecurity undercount acute hunger

Hope Michelson, Erin Lentz, Kathy Baylis, Kim Chungmann
2 citations
Nature Food
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
5.63
article

Official estimates of global food insecurity undercount acute hunger

Hope Michelson, Erin Lentz, Kathy Baylis, Kim Chungmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system is the official global method for classifying food insecurity. As of 2023, international agencies and governments use IPC analyses to allocate more than US$6 billion of humanitarian assistance annually. Here we evaluate data from approximately 1 billion people in more than 10,000 IPC subnational analyses conducted between 2017 and 2023. We find that IPC estimates understate the extent and severity of crises. Our primary estimates indicate that IPC subnational analyses underestimate the number of acutely hungry people in the world, missing approximately one in five. We find evidence of under-classification around the IPC threshold that determines whether an area is classified as 'stressed' or 'in crisis'-a threshold meant to trigger deployment of humanitarian resources. Contrary to widely held assumptions, our findings suggest that IPC analyses are conservative; the prevalence and severity of acute hunger is probably considerably higher than global estimates indicate.

Nature FoodVol. 6(12)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Lyndon Baines Johnson Hospital (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Official estimates of global food insecurity undercount acute hunger — Hope Michelson, Erin Lentz, et al. · Nature Food (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS