EVALUATION OF MAGNETOS PUTTY AS A STANDALONE BONE GRAFT FOR HINDFOOT FUSION: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Background Autologous cancellous bone, the “gold standard” for bone grafting, is limited by donor site morbidity, restricted availability, and procedural complications. Synthetic bone graft substitutes, particularly calcium phosphate ceramics (CaPs) with submicron topography, offer a promising alternative due to their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. MagnetOs Putty, a synthetic CaP-based graft with advanced submicron surface topography, has demonstrated equivalence to autograft in preclinical and human clinical studies. This study evaluates the clinical performance of MagnetOs Putty as a standalone bone graft in hindfoot fusion Objectives This study aims to (1) evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of MagnetOs Putty in hindfoot fusion, (2) compare these outcomes to autograft, and (3) assess patient-reported outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates. Study Design and Methods A retrospective medical chart review identifiedof 72 patients undergoing hindfoot fusion that met the inclusion criteriawas conducted. Data was collected from Patients receiving either MagnetOS Putty (36) or were divided into two groups: 36 treated with MagnetOs Putty and 36 with autologous bone graft. Inclusion criteria required degenerative hindfoot disease, treatment with either graft type, and follow-up data availability. Primary outcomes included radiographic fusion assessed by independent, blinded radiological analysis. Secondary outcomes included changes in outcome scores, complication rates, and reoperation rates. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests will used to analyze the results. Results Data collection is ongoing Results are forthcoming and will describe fusion rates, clinical outcomes, and complication rates associated with MagnetOs Putty compared to autograft. Preliminary analysis suggests that MagnetOs Putty offers a viable alternative to autograft for hindfoot fusion. Conclusions This study aims to provide evidence supporting the use of MagnetOs Putty as a standalone bone graft in foot and ankle surgery, addressing limitations and avoiding complications associated with of traditional grafting materials. The findings could inform clinical decision-making and promote the adoption of advanced synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.16.003
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION OF MAGNETOS PUTTY AS A STANDALONE BONE GRAFT FOR HINDFOOT FUSION: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Paulo Amado, Katherine Sage, Liset van Dijk
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

EVALUATION OF MAGNETOS PUTTY AS A STANDALONE BONE GRAFT FOR HINDFOOT FUSION: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Paulo Amado, Katherine Sage, Liset van Dijk
article en

Abstract

Background Autologous cancellous bone, the “gold standard” for bone grafting, is limited by donor site morbidity, restricted availability, and procedural complications. Synthetic bone graft substitutes, particularly calcium phosphate ceramics (CaPs) with submicron topography, offer a promising alternative due to their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. MagnetOs Putty, a synthetic CaP-based graft with advanced submicron surface topography, has demonstrated equivalence to autograft in preclinical and human clinical studies. This study evaluates the clinical performance of MagnetOs Putty as a standalone bone graft in hindfoot fusion Objectives This study aims to (1) evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of MagnetOs Putty in hindfoot fusion, (2) compare these outcomes to autograft, and (3) assess patient-reported outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates. Study Design and Methods A retrospective medical chart review identifiedof 72 patients undergoing hindfoot fusion that met the inclusion criteriawas conducted. Data was collected from Patients receiving either MagnetOS Putty (36) or were divided into two groups: 36 treated with MagnetOs Putty and 36 with autologous bone graft. Inclusion criteria required degenerative hindfoot disease, treatment with either graft type, and follow-up data availability. Primary outcomes included radiographic fusion assessed by independent, blinded radiological analysis. Secondary outcomes included changes in outcome scores, complication rates, and reoperation rates. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests will used to analyze the results. Results Data collection is ongoing Results are forthcoming and will describe fusion rates, clinical outcomes, and complication rates associated with MagnetOs Putty compared to autograft. Preliminary analysis suggests that MagnetOs Putty offers a viable alternative to autograft for hindfoot fusion. Conclusions This study aims to provide evidence supporting the use of MagnetOs Putty as a standalone bone graft in foot and ankle surgery, addressing limitations and avoiding complications associated with of traditional grafting materials. The findings could inform clinical decision-making and promote the adoption of advanced synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_16)
Kuros Biosciences (Switzerland) (CH), Lusíada University of Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.