RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF RADIOLOGICAL ALIGNMENT IN CERVICAL MYELOPATHY

Introduction Cervical myelopathy is common and can lead to significant morbidities and can be caused by various pathologies. Understanding radiological differences between them would be crucial for optimising diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to outline the prevalence of cervical spine pathologies contributing to myelopathy and the correlation between cervical alignment and the causative pathology. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred to our spine centre from 2020–2024. The preoperative and postoperative imaging, patient demographics (age, ethnicity, BMI) and clinical presentation were reviewed. Pathologies identified were spondylosis, disc protrusion and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL), and their alignments were assessed using erect X-ray and MRI using the C2–C7 Cobb angle. Results 42 patients were included in the study after exclusion. 85.7% of them had myelopathic signs and 38% of them had associated radicular symptoms. Spondylosis accounted for 59.5%, disc protrusion 23.8% and OPLL 16.6% of patients. The average C2 to C7 Cobb angle on erect X-ray for spondylosis was 4.3±14.1°, for disc it was 9.4±13.9°, and for OPLL 8.8±9.8°. On MRI these were 6.0±12.2°, 5.3±8.0° and 4.5±9.5° respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups and no correlation between pathology and cobb angle was found (C2-7 cobb angle on erect X-ray r=-0.653; p=0.526, cobb angle on MRI r=0.069, p=0.934). Discussion Our study found no significant correlation between the specific cervical spine pathologies and the cervical spine alignments. There was a wide confidence interval within the pathology groups which could suggest individual variability in cervical alignment irrespective of the causative pathology. Despite these findings, the alignment remains a critical factor in cervical spine surgical planning. Conclusion No significant correlation was found between pathology and Cobb angle on X-ray or MRI. Erect X-ray remains crucial for accurate cervical alignment and optimal treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.16.023
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF RADIOLOGICAL ALIGNMENT IN CERVICAL MYELOPATHY

G. Park, Henrik Baecker
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF RADIOLOGICAL ALIGNMENT IN CERVICAL MYELOPATHY

G. Park, Henrik Baecker
article en

Abstract

Introduction Cervical myelopathy is common and can lead to significant morbidities and can be caused by various pathologies. Understanding radiological differences between them would be crucial for optimising diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to outline the prevalence of cervical spine pathologies contributing to myelopathy and the correlation between cervical alignment and the causative pathology. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred to our spine centre from 2020–2024. The preoperative and postoperative imaging, patient demographics (age, ethnicity, BMI) and clinical presentation were reviewed. Pathologies identified were spondylosis, disc protrusion and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL), and their alignments were assessed using erect X-ray and MRI using the C2–C7 Cobb angle. Results 42 patients were included in the study after exclusion. 85.7% of them had myelopathic signs and 38% of them had associated radicular symptoms. Spondylosis accounted for 59.5%, disc protrusion 23.8% and OPLL 16.6% of patients. The average C2 to C7 Cobb angle on erect X-ray for spondylosis was 4.3±14.1°, for disc it was 9.4±13.9°, and for OPLL 8.8±9.8°. On MRI these were 6.0±12.2°, 5.3±8.0° and 4.5±9.5° respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups and no correlation between pathology and cobb angle was found (C2-7 cobb angle on erect X-ray r=-0.653; p=0.526, cobb angle on MRI r=0.069, p=0.934). Discussion Our study found no significant correlation between the specific cervical spine pathologies and the cervical spine alignments. There was a wide confidence interval within the pathology groups which could suggest individual variability in cervical alignment irrespective of the causative pathology. Despite these findings, the alignment remains a critical factor in cervical spine surgical planning. Conclusion No significant correlation was found between pathology and Cobb angle on X-ray or MRI. Erect X-ray remains crucial for accurate cervical alignment and optimal treatment planning.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_16)
Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.