SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE MID- TO LONG-TERM EFFECTS AND SAFETY OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION THERAPY

Introduction High Intensity Resistance Training (HIRT) is the gold standard for muscle training, but high loads pose a risk to the vulnerable groups, such as the elderly or those who have undergone surgery. Blood flow restriction therapy (BFRT) has been posed as an alternative, which involves conducting Low Intensity Resistance Training (LIRT) with a tourniquet on the limb/ limbs, allowing for equivalent muscle adaptations under lower intensities of exercise. This review aims to address the gap in the mid to long term effects of BFRT in the literature. Method A literature search was conducted throughout the period of August 2023. 12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for the review after exclusion. These included contributions from Japan, North America, Germany and Brazil. Studies included 221 healthy participants at average age of 24 with minim training period of eight weeks. The outcomes assessed were strength, hypertrophy endurance performance and safety. Results BFRT consistently improved strength and hypertrophy compared to baseline LIRT. Gains were generally comparable to HIRT. Endurance outcomes, like VO2max, were also comparable to HIRT. BFRT was well tolerated, with no increased perceived exertion or pain and no reported complications. Discussion BFRT's benefits stem from inducing a hypoxic environment, mimicking HIRT's mechanism of action. This involves increased growth hormone release, anabolic signalling, anaerobic metabolic accumulation and preferential type II muscle recruitment. This study has shown that BFRT is a safe and effective alternative to muscle development. Conclusion This review shows significant mid to long term benefits of BFRT for muscle strength, hypertrophy and endurable, comparable to HIRT, with fewer posed risks. It is a valuable tool requiring further research to standardise protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.16.031
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE MID- TO LONG-TERM EFFECTS AND SAFETY OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION THERAPY

Henrik Baecker, Geonhoo Park
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE MID- TO LONG-TERM EFFECTS AND SAFETY OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION THERAPY

Henrik Baecker, Geonhoo Park
article en

Abstract

Introduction High Intensity Resistance Training (HIRT) is the gold standard for muscle training, but high loads pose a risk to the vulnerable groups, such as the elderly or those who have undergone surgery. Blood flow restriction therapy (BFRT) has been posed as an alternative, which involves conducting Low Intensity Resistance Training (LIRT) with a tourniquet on the limb/ limbs, allowing for equivalent muscle adaptations under lower intensities of exercise. This review aims to address the gap in the mid to long term effects of BFRT in the literature. Method A literature search was conducted throughout the period of August 2023. 12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for the review after exclusion. These included contributions from Japan, North America, Germany and Brazil. Studies included 221 healthy participants at average age of 24 with minim training period of eight weeks. The outcomes assessed were strength, hypertrophy endurance performance and safety. Results BFRT consistently improved strength and hypertrophy compared to baseline LIRT. Gains were generally comparable to HIRT. Endurance outcomes, like VO2max, were also comparable to HIRT. BFRT was well tolerated, with no increased perceived exertion or pain and no reported complications. Discussion BFRT's benefits stem from inducing a hypoxic environment, mimicking HIRT's mechanism of action. This involves increased growth hormone release, anabolic signalling, anaerobic metabolic accumulation and preferential type II muscle recruitment. This study has shown that BFRT is a safe and effective alternative to muscle development. Conclusion This review shows significant mid to long term benefits of BFRT for muscle strength, hypertrophy and endurable, comparable to HIRT, with fewer posed risks. It is a valuable tool requiring further research to standardise protocols.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_16)
Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.