CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING EARLY VERSUS DELAYED DECOMPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Introduction The timing of decompression in thoracic and/or lumbar spine injuries remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed whether early decompression improves clinical outcomes compared to delayed intervention. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar was performed. Outcomes included neurological improvement, respiratory complications, perioperative mortality, length of stay (LOS) in hospital and ICU, and duration on mechanical ventilation. Log odds ratios (LOR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated. Subgroup analysis by timing thresholds (24, 48, 72 hours) and meta-regression for injury severity were conducted. Results 43 studies were included. Early decompression was associated with increased odds of neurological improvement (LOR = 0.82, p < 0.001), decreased LOS in hospital (MD = -3.19, p < 0.001) and ICU (MD = -3.21, p = 0.01), fewer respiratory complications (LOR = 0.58, p = 0.01), and shorter ventilation time (MD = -2.41, p = 0.01). No difference was observed in perioperative mortality (p = 0.52). Effects were greater in studies including severely injured patients. Subgroup analysis showed 48-hour cutoff provided optimal benefits for neurological recovery and ICU LOS. Discussion Early decompression offers neurological and systemic benefits. Reduced ICU and ventilation times may reflect earlier mobilisation and improved respiratory function. Benefits were amplified in severely injured patients, suggesting that timely intervention may mitigate the physiological impact of polytrauma. The lack of increased perioperative mortality supports the safety of early surgery. While heterogeneity exists in study designs and definitions of “early,” the consistent direction of benefit supports prioritising earlier intervention. Conclusion Early surgical decompression (<48 hours) in thoracolumbar spine injuries improves neurological and respiratory outcomes and reduces hospital resource use. Early intervention should be considered, especially in severe cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.16.037
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING EARLY VERSUS DELAYED DECOMPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

R. Kyle Martin, Henrik Baecker, Tim Soon Cheok, Khay-Wee Toh
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING EARLY VERSUS DELAYED DECOMPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH THORACOLUMBAR SPINE INJURIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

R. Kyle Martin, Henrik Baecker, Tim Soon Cheok, Khay-Wee Toh
article en

Abstract

Introduction The timing of decompression in thoracic and/or lumbar spine injuries remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed whether early decompression improves clinical outcomes compared to delayed intervention. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar was performed. Outcomes included neurological improvement, respiratory complications, perioperative mortality, length of stay (LOS) in hospital and ICU, and duration on mechanical ventilation. Log odds ratios (LOR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated. Subgroup analysis by timing thresholds (24, 48, 72 hours) and meta-regression for injury severity were conducted. Results 43 studies were included. Early decompression was associated with increased odds of neurological improvement (LOR = 0.82, p < 0.001), decreased LOS in hospital (MD = -3.19, p < 0.001) and ICU (MD = -3.21, p = 0.01), fewer respiratory complications (LOR = 0.58, p = 0.01), and shorter ventilation time (MD = -2.41, p = 0.01). No difference was observed in perioperative mortality (p = 0.52). Effects were greater in studies including severely injured patients. Subgroup analysis showed 48-hour cutoff provided optimal benefits for neurological recovery and ICU LOS. Discussion Early decompression offers neurological and systemic benefits. Reduced ICU and ventilation times may reflect earlier mobilisation and improved respiratory function. Benefits were amplified in severely injured patients, suggesting that timely intervention may mitigate the physiological impact of polytrauma. The lack of increased perioperative mortality supports the safety of early surgery. While heterogeneity exists in study designs and definitions of “early,” the consistent direction of benefit supports prioritising earlier intervention. Conclusion Early surgical decompression (<48 hours) in thoracolumbar spine injuries improves neurological and respiratory outcomes and reduces hospital resource use. Early intervention should be considered, especially in severe cases.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_16)
Auckland City Hospital (NZ), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.