Reducing attention bias toward negative emotional stimuli with transcranial random noise stimulation: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study

Excessive attention bias interferes with daily life and contributes to various psychiatric conditions. Previous studies have demonstrated that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can enhance attentional control and reduce negative emotional bias. However, little is known about the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on attention bias. This study aimed to investigate whether tRNS reduces attention bias toward negative emotional stimuli compared to tDCS, for which functional evidence has been established. This randomized, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled study enrolled 32 healthy right-handed men. The emotional Stroop task was used to assess attention bias. The participants experienced all three stimulation conditions: tRNS, tDCS, or sham, with each condition separated by a 7-day washout interval and administered in a random order. tRNS to the left DLPFC significantly reduced attention bias toward negative stimuli compared with sham (corrected p = 0.047, Cohen’s d = 0.72), whereas no significant difference was observed between tRNS and tDCS. Positive correlations were observed between the effects of each stimulation condition and attention bias in the sham condition in the tRNS and tDCS groups; however, these associations did not exceed the empirical null distribution determined by permutation testing. Thus, the modulatory effects of tRNS on attentional control may not strictly depend on baseline bias magnitude, suggesting its potential applicability in both healthy and clinical populations characterized by excessive attention bias. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry in Japan (UMIN000052202) on 09/13/2023; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000059574.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28306-w
Primary Topic
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing attention bias toward negative emotional stimuli with transcranial random noise stimulation: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study

Susumu Yoshida, Yumie Ono, Ryuji Saito, Mitsunori Miyazaki et al.
Scientific Reports
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
article

Reducing attention bias toward negative emotional stimuli with transcranial random noise stimulation: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study

Susumu Yoshida, Yumie Ono, Ryuji Saito, Mitsunori Miyazaki, Naoya Hasegawa, Kazufumi Okada, Meili Duan, Kôichi Yokosawa, T Maeyama, Daisuke Sawamura, Harukazu Tohyama, Akihiro Watanabe, Yuji Inagaki
article en

Abstract

Excessive attention bias interferes with daily life and contributes to various psychiatric conditions. Previous studies have demonstrated that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can enhance attentional control and reduce negative emotional bias. However, little is known about the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on attention bias. This study aimed to investigate whether tRNS reduces attention bias toward negative emotional stimuli compared to tDCS, for which functional evidence has been established. This randomized, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled study enrolled 32 healthy right-handed men. The emotional Stroop task was used to assess attention bias. The participants experienced all three stimulation conditions: tRNS, tDCS, or sham, with each condition separated by a 7-day washout interval and administered in a random order. tRNS to the left DLPFC significantly reduced attention bias toward negative stimuli compared with sham (corrected p = 0.047, Cohen’s d = 0.72), whereas no significant difference was observed between tRNS and tDCS. Positive correlations were observed between the effects of each stimulation condition and attention bias in the sham condition in the tRNS and tDCS groups; however, these associations did not exceed the empirical null distribution determined by permutation testing. Thus, the modulatory effects of tRNS on attentional control may not strictly depend on baseline bias magnitude, suggesting its potential applicability in both healthy and clinical populations characterized by excessive attention bias. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry in Japan (UMIN000052202) on 09/13/2023; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000059574.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Hiroshima University (JP), Health Sciences University of Hokkaido (JP), The University of Melbourne (AU), Meiji University (JP), Sapporo University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Sapporo Medical University Hospital (JP), Hokkaido University Hospital (JP), Melbourne Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.