Repetition in Action: Søren Kierkegaard and the Problem of Human Agency in the Anthropocene

One of the most perplexing aspects of life on a climate-changed planet concerns the status of human action. As Donna Haraway observes, we appear to be stuck between a rock and a hard place: On the one hand, there is the “position that the game is over, it’s too late, there’s no sense trying to make anything any better,” and on the other side, we encounter “the comic faith in technofixes.” In this paper, my goal is to investigate how we might overcome this persistent stalemate and recover a type of action that is properly adjusted to the exigencies of the climate emergency. Building on Sharon Krause’s re-conceptualization of nonsovereign, normatively inflected agency, I shall demonstrate that a critical turn to Søren Kierkegaard’s discussion of repetition provides valuable resources for precisely such an endeavor. “Repetition” here means, surprisingly, the complete opposite of business as usual. Rather, Kierkegaard’s thoughts reveal a mode of acting that allows us to get the world back at the very moment when all seems lost. Paradoxically, this only becomes an option once an agent forsakes the pretense of control and mastery over their environment. The paper suggests that this complex notion of agency, and the attendant conception of existential attunement (via faith, resignation, hope, and anxiety), is best suited for navigating the disconcerting reality of the Anthropocene.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Theory
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917251398784
Primary Topic
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repetition in Action: Søren Kierkegaard and the Problem of Human Agency in the Anthropocene

Mathias Thaler
Political Theory
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
article

Repetition in Action: Søren Kierkegaard and the Problem of Human Agency in the Anthropocene

Mathias Thaler
article en

Abstract

One of the most perplexing aspects of life on a climate-changed planet concerns the status of human action. As Donna Haraway observes, we appear to be stuck between a rock and a hard place: On the one hand, there is the “position that the game is over, it’s too late, there’s no sense trying to make anything any better,” and on the other side, we encounter “the comic faith in technofixes.” In this paper, my goal is to investigate how we might overcome this persistent stalemate and recover a type of action that is properly adjusted to the exigencies of the climate emergency. Building on Sharon Krause’s re-conceptualization of nonsovereign, normatively inflected agency, I shall demonstrate that a critical turn to Søren Kierkegaard’s discussion of repetition provides valuable resources for precisely such an endeavor. “Repetition” here means, surprisingly, the complete opposite of business as usual. Rather, Kierkegaard’s thoughts reveal a mode of acting that allows us to get the world back at the very moment when all seems lost. Paradoxically, this only becomes an option once an agent forsakes the pretense of control and mastery over their environment. The paper suggests that this complex notion of agency, and the attendant conception of existential attunement (via faith, resignation, hope, and anxiety), is best suited for navigating the disconcerting reality of the Anthropocene.

Political TheoryVol. 54(2)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.