Linking hierarchical classification of transcription factors by the structure of their DNA-binding domains to the variability of their binding site motifs

De novo motif search is the main approach for determining the nucleotide specificity of binding of the key regulators of gene transcription, transcription factors (TFs), based on data from massive genome-wide sequencing of their binding site regions in vivo, such as ChIP-seq. The number of motifs of known TF binding sites (TFBSs) has increased several times in recent years. Due to the similarity in the structure of the DNA-binding domains of TFs, many structurally cognate TFs have similar and sometimes almost indistinguishable binding site motifs. The classification of TFs by the structure of the DNA-binding domains from the TFClass database defines the top levels of the hierarchy (superclasses and classes of TFs) by the structure of these domains, and the next levels (families and subfamilies of TFs) by the alignments of amino acid sequences of domains. However, this classification does not take into account the similarity of TFBS motifs, whereas identification of valid TFs from massive sequencing data of TFBSs, such as ChIP- seq, requires working with TFBS motifs rather than TFs themselves. Therefore, in this study we extracted from the Hocomoco and Jaspar databases the TFBS motifs for human and fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, and considered the pairwise similarity of binding site motifs of cognate TFs according to their classification from the TFClass database. We have shown that the common tree of the TF hierarchy by the structure of DNA-binding domains can be split into separate branches representing non-overlapping sets of TFs. Within each branch, the majority of TF pairs have significantly similar binding site motifs. Each branch can include one or more sister elementary units of the hierarchy and all its/their lower levels: one or more TFs of the same subfamily, or the whole subfamily, one or several subfamilies of the same family, an entire family, etc., up to the entire class. Analysis of the seven largest human and two largest Drosophila TF classes showed that the similarity of TFs in terms of TFBS motifs for different corresponding levels (classes, families) is noticeably different. Supplementing the hierarchical classification of TFs with branches combining significantly similar motifs of TFBSs can increase the efficiency of identifying involved TFs through enriched motifs detected by de novo motif search for massive sequencing data of TFBSs from the ChIP-seq technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18699/vjgb-25-99
Primary Topic
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking hierarchical classification of transcription factors by the structure of their DNA-binding domains to the variability of their binding site motifs

V. G. Levitsky, Vladimir V. Raditsa, T. Yu. Vatolina
Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
article

Linking hierarchical classification of transcription factors by the structure of their DNA-binding domains to the variability of their binding site motifs

V. G. Levitsky, Vladimir V. Raditsa, T. Yu. Vatolina
article en

Abstract

De novo motif search is the main approach for determining the nucleotide specificity of binding of the key regulators of gene transcription, transcription factors (TFs), based on data from massive genome-wide sequencing of their binding site regions in vivo, such as ChIP-seq. The number of motifs of known TF binding sites (TFBSs) has increased several times in recent years. Due to the similarity in the structure of the DNA-binding domains of TFs, many structurally cognate TFs have similar and sometimes almost indistinguishable binding site motifs. The classification of TFs by the structure of the DNA-binding domains from the TFClass database defines the top levels of the hierarchy (superclasses and classes of TFs) by the structure of these domains, and the next levels (families and subfamilies of TFs) by the alignments of amino acid sequences of domains. However, this classification does not take into account the similarity of TFBS motifs, whereas identification of valid TFs from massive sequencing data of TFBSs, such as ChIP- seq, requires working with TFBS motifs rather than TFs themselves. Therefore, in this study we extracted from the Hocomoco and Jaspar databases the TFBS motifs for human and fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, and considered the pairwise similarity of binding site motifs of cognate TFs according to their classification from the TFClass database. We have shown that the common tree of the TF hierarchy by the structure of DNA-binding domains can be split into separate branches representing non-overlapping sets of TFs. Within each branch, the majority of TF pairs have significantly similar binding site motifs. Each branch can include one or more sister elementary units of the hierarchy and all its/their lower levels: one or more TFs of the same subfamily, or the whole subfamily, one or several subfamilies of the same family, an entire family, etc., up to the entire class. Analysis of the seven largest human and two largest Drosophila TF classes showed that the similarity of TFs in terms of TFBS motifs for different corresponding levels (classes, families) is noticeably different. Supplementing the hierarchical classification of TFs with branches combining significantly similar motifs of TFBSs can increase the efficiency of identifying involved TFs through enriched motifs detected by de novo motif search for massive sequencing data of TFBSs from the ChIP-seq technology.

Vavilov Journal of Genetics and BreedingVol. 29(7)
Institute of Cytology and Genetics (RU), Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.