Training strategies for competing multiagent dynamical systems

We explore competitive dynamics in multiagent active matter systems using reinforcement learning. In our study, two active Brownian particles (referred to as predators) were trained using either simultaneous or sequential protocols to capture ten passive Brownian particles (preys). The training results depend on the agent, and generally one agent tends to overperform the other. To assess the effectiveness of the two protocols, we examined two policies: (i) a natural policy, where updates to the reinforcement learning parameters of both predators were stopped at a fixed time, even if one agent performed suboptimally; and (ii) a hybrid policy, where we combined the reinforcement learning parameters recorded when each agent achieved its optimal performance. If limited to natural training, simultaneous training appears to be the better option. However, when hybrid training is also allowed, sequential training becomes the preferred choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. E
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/36rk-41pp
Primary Topic
Micro and Nano Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training strategies for competing multiagent dynamical systems

Karl J. Friston
Physical review. E
Micro and Nano Robotics
article

Training strategies for competing multiagent dynamical systems

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

We explore competitive dynamics in multiagent active matter systems using reinforcement learning. In our study, two active Brownian particles (referred to as predators) were trained using either simultaneous or sequential protocols to capture ten passive Brownian particles (preys). The training results depend on the agent, and generally one agent tends to overperform the other. To assess the effectiveness of the two protocols, we examined two policies: (i) a natural policy, where updates to the reinforcement learning parameters of both predators were stopped at a fixed time, even if one agent performed suboptimally; and (ii) a hybrid policy, where we combined the reinforcement learning parameters recorded when each agent achieved its optimal performance. If limited to natural training, simultaneous training appears to be the better option. However, when hybrid training is also allowed, sequential training becomes the preferred choice.

Physical review. EVol. 112(6)
Università di Camerino (IT), Tongji University (CN), Loughborough University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Micro and Nano Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Training strategies for competing multiagent dynamical systems — Karl J. Friston · Physical review. E (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS