Analyzing problem solving in secondary physics education: A rubric-guided approach to explore individual learning needs

This study examines how the Minnesota Assessment of Problem-Solving rubric can be used to diagnose learning needs in secondary physics education. In total, 51 students (grades 9 and 11) from 5 German secondary schools solved a physics problem-solving task and completed an energy concept test. Rubric-guided analysis of their written problem solutions revealed seven characteristic performance patterns, ranging from expertlike reasoning to incomplete or failed approaches. While students generally managed descriptions and basic calculations, many struggled to apply the conservation principle and to structure their reasoning coherently. The combination of rubric scores with conceptual test results highlighted whether difficulties stemmed from missing knowledge or from challenges in applying it. These findings demonstrate that this combination of assessment tools, adapted to the secondary level, offers a practical approach for formative assessment and targeted support in physics problem solving. However, difficulties arise when students submit incomplete problem solutions. Future developments could focus on atomized approaches or the integration of AI technologies for automatic assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/3bs7-fnrd
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing problem solving in secondary physics education: A rubric-guided approach to explore individual learning needs

Karl J. Friston
1 citations
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
article

Analyzing problem solving in secondary physics education: A rubric-guided approach to explore individual learning needs

Karl J. Friston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines how the Minnesota Assessment of Problem-Solving rubric can be used to diagnose learning needs in secondary physics education. In total, 51 students (grades 9 and 11) from 5 German secondary schools solved a physics problem-solving task and completed an energy concept test. Rubric-guided analysis of their written problem solutions revealed seven characteristic performance patterns, ranging from expertlike reasoning to incomplete or failed approaches. While students generally managed descriptions and basic calculations, many struggled to apply the conservation principle and to structure their reasoning coherently. The combination of rubric scores with conceptual test results highlighted whether difficulties stemmed from missing knowledge or from challenges in applying it. These findings demonstrate that this combination of assessment tools, adapted to the secondary level, offers a practical approach for formative assessment and targeted support in physics problem solving. However, difficulties arise when students submit incomplete problem solutions. Future developments could focus on atomized approaches or the integration of AI technologies for automatic assessment.

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 22(1)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing problem solving in secondary physics education: A rubric-guided approach to explore individual learning needs — Karl J. Friston · Physical Review Physics Education Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS