Can Analyst Coverage Reduce Corporate ESG Greenwashing? Evidence from China

In this study, we analyze data from Chinese-listed firms, spanning the period 2011–2021, to address the question of whether analyst coverage reduces environmental, social, and governance (ESG) greenwashing. The results indicated that analysts act as an external governance mechanism that significantly restrains corporate ESG greenwashing. This effect operates through enhanced information transparency and strengthened monitoring. Furthermore, institutional ownership and media attention serve as moderators in this relationship, revealing a substitution effect between different governance mechanisms. Moreover, further analysis into heterogeneous effects uncovers that the effects are markedly stronger in firms with higher financial constraints and that belong to polluting and highly competitive industries. Our findings underscore the unique governance role of financial analysts in mitigating ESG misconduct and advancing corporate sustainability in emerging markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411138
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Analyst Coverage Reduce Corporate ESG Greenwashing? Evidence from China

Xiaohui Wu, Chunying Zhang
Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Can Analyst Coverage Reduce Corporate ESG Greenwashing? Evidence from China

Xiaohui Wu, Chunying Zhang
article en

Abstract

In this study, we analyze data from Chinese-listed firms, spanning the period 2011–2021, to address the question of whether analyst coverage reduces environmental, social, and governance (ESG) greenwashing. The results indicated that analysts act as an external governance mechanism that significantly restrains corporate ESG greenwashing. This effect operates through enhanced information transparency and strengthened monitoring. Furthermore, institutional ownership and media attention serve as moderators in this relationship, revealing a substitution effect between different governance mechanisms. Moreover, further analysis into heterogeneous effects uncovers that the effects are markedly stronger in firms with higher financial constraints and that belong to polluting and highly competitive industries. Our findings underscore the unique governance role of financial analysts in mitigating ESG misconduct and advancing corporate sustainability in emerging markets.

SustainabilityVol. 17(24)
Beihua University (CN), Xiamen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.