The Role of Heterogeneous Marine Environmental Regulation in SDGs-Integrated Marine Economic Development

With the growing global reliance on marine resources, issues pertaining to the marine environment and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-integrated development of the marine economy have gained worldwide attention. This study employs the synthetic control method (SCM) and difference-in-differences (DID) approach to assess the impact of three heterogeneous types of marine environmental regulations—market incentives, command-and-control, and public participation—on the SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy. Special focus is placed on the detailed mechanisms through which these regulatory approaches influence five key dimensions of the SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy. Overall, the results show that market incentive regulation has a significant positive effect on the SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy. In contrast, command-and-control and public participation regulations demonstrate varying degrees of inhibitory influence. Examining the five dimensions of SDGs-integrated development, innovation-driven development, industrial coordination, green construction, open cooperation, and the sharing of livelihoods, market incentive regulation promotes innovation-driven and open cooperation dimensions while inhibiting industrial coordination, green construction, and the sharing of livelihoods. command-and-control regulation positively promotes people’s sharing of livelihoods but negatively impacts the other four dimensions, with the strongest inhibitory effect on the innovation-driven dimension. Public participation regulations inhibit innovation-driven development and the sharing of livelihoods, with the most pronounced suppression observed in innovation-driven development. Conversely, they promote industrial coordination, green construction, and open cooperation. Based on these findings, this paper proposes a series of policy recommendations aimed at achieving coordinated integration between marine ecological governance and SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411141
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Heterogeneous Marine Environmental Regulation in SDGs-Integrated Marine Economic Development

Lehua Gao, Fei Wang, Shuang Yu, Longxuan Zhang et al.
Sustainability
Coastal and Marine Management
article

The Role of Heterogeneous Marine Environmental Regulation in SDGs-Integrated Marine Economic Development

Lehua Gao, Fei Wang, Shuang Yu, Longxuan Zhang, Xuhai Yang
article en

Abstract

With the growing global reliance on marine resources, issues pertaining to the marine environment and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-integrated development of the marine economy have gained worldwide attention. This study employs the synthetic control method (SCM) and difference-in-differences (DID) approach to assess the impact of three heterogeneous types of marine environmental regulations—market incentives, command-and-control, and public participation—on the SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy. Special focus is placed on the detailed mechanisms through which these regulatory approaches influence five key dimensions of the SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy. Overall, the results show that market incentive regulation has a significant positive effect on the SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy. In contrast, command-and-control and public participation regulations demonstrate varying degrees of inhibitory influence. Examining the five dimensions of SDGs-integrated development, innovation-driven development, industrial coordination, green construction, open cooperation, and the sharing of livelihoods, market incentive regulation promotes innovation-driven and open cooperation dimensions while inhibiting industrial coordination, green construction, and the sharing of livelihoods. command-and-control regulation positively promotes people’s sharing of livelihoods but negatively impacts the other four dimensions, with the strongest inhibitory effect on the innovation-driven dimension. Public participation regulations inhibit innovation-driven development and the sharing of livelihoods, with the most pronounced suppression observed in innovation-driven development. Conversely, they promote industrial coordination, green construction, and open cooperation. Based on these findings, this paper proposes a series of policy recommendations aimed at achieving coordinated integration between marine ecological governance and SDGs-integrated development of the marine economy.

SustainabilityVol. 17(24)
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (CN), Ocean University of China (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.