Machine Learning Applications in Archaeological Practices: A Review

Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in archaeology have increased significantly in recent years, and these now span all subfields, geographical regions, and time periods: from prehistory to modern times. The prevalence and success of these applications have remained largely unexamined, as recent reviews on the use of machine learning in archaeology have only focused only on specific subfields of archaeology. Our review examined an exhaustive corpus of 135 articles published between 1997 and 2022. We observed a significant increase in the number of relevant publications from 2019 onwards, mainly concentrated in a few journals and mainly published in open-access format. Automatic structure detection and artefact classification were the most represented tasks in the articles reviewed, followed by taphonomy, archaeological predictive modelling, and architectural classification or reconstruction. From the corpus of articles analysed, clustering and unsupervised methods were underrepresented compared to supervised models. Artificial neural networks and ensemble learning account for two thirds of the total number of models used. However, if machine learning models are gaining in popularity, they remain subject to misunderstanding. We observed, in some cases, poorly defined requirements and caveats of the machine learning methods used. Furthermore, the goals and the needs of machine learning applications for archaeological purposes are in some cases unclear or poorly expressed. To address this, we propose here a workflow guide for archaeologists to develop coherent and consistent methodologies adapted to their research questions, project scale and available data. As in many areas of modern life, machine learning is rapidly becoming an important tool in archaeological research and practice, particularly useful for the analyses of large and highly multivariate data, although not without limitations. This review highlights the importance of well-defined and well-reported structured methodologies and collaborative practices to maximise the potential of applications of machine learning methods in archaeological research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.201
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Applications in Archaeological Practices: A Review

Jonathan S. Reeves, Mathias Bellat, Claudio Tennie, Ruhollah Taghizadeh‐Mehrjardi et al.
4 citations
Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
5.10
article

Machine Learning Applications in Archaeological Practices: A Review

Jonathan S. Reeves, Mathias Bellat, Claudio Tennie, Ruhollah Taghizadeh‐Mehrjardi, Thomas Scholten, Jordy Didier Orellana Figueroa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in archaeology have increased significantly in recent years, and these now span all subfields, geographical regions, and time periods: from prehistory to modern times. The prevalence and success of these applications have remained largely unexamined, as recent reviews on the use of machine learning in archaeology have only focused only on specific subfields of archaeology. Our review examined an exhaustive corpus of 135 articles published between 1997 and 2022. We observed a significant increase in the number of relevant publications from 2019 onwards, mainly concentrated in a few journals and mainly published in open-access format. Automatic structure detection and artefact classification were the most represented tasks in the articles reviewed, followed by taphonomy, archaeological predictive modelling, and architectural classification or reconstruction. From the corpus of articles analysed, clustering and unsupervised methods were underrepresented compared to supervised models. Artificial neural networks and ensemble learning account for two thirds of the total number of models used. However, if machine learning models are gaining in popularity, they remain subject to misunderstanding. We observed, in some cases, poorly defined requirements and caveats of the machine learning methods used. Furthermore, the goals and the needs of machine learning applications for archaeological purposes are in some cases unclear or poorly expressed. To address this, we propose here a workflow guide for archaeologists to develop coherent and consistent methodologies adapted to their research questions, project scale and available data. As in many areas of modern life, machine learning is rapidly becoming an important tool in archaeological research and practice, particularly useful for the analyses of large and highly multivariate data, although not without limitations. This review highlights the importance of well-defined and well-reported structured methodologies and collaborative practices to maximise the potential of applications of machine learning methods in archaeological research.

Journal of Computer Applications in ArchaeologyVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
5.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.