Heterophobic interactions hinder consensus formation in sparse random networks

Heterophobic interactions, which drive individuals to be repelled from others with opposite opinions, play a role as important as homophilic ones in shaping many dynamical processes on social networks, such as opinion formation, social balance, or epidemic spreading. In this paper, we use belief propagation and Monte Carlo simulations on treelike signed graphs to predict that a sufficient propensity to heterophobia can impede a consensus that would otherwise emerge via a phase transition. As the strength of heterophobic interactions and the rationality of individuals with respect to social stress decrease, this transition changes from continuous to discontinuous, with a strong dependence on the initial conditions. The size of the parameter region where consensus can be reached from any initial condition decays as a power-law function of the number of discussed topics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. E
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/cxsr-dh25
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterophobic interactions hinder consensus formation in sparse random networks

Karl J. Friston
Physical review. E
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

Heterophobic interactions hinder consensus formation in sparse random networks

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

Heterophobic interactions, which drive individuals to be repelled from others with opposite opinions, play a role as important as homophilic ones in shaping many dynamical processes on social networks, such as opinion formation, social balance, or epidemic spreading. In this paper, we use belief propagation and Monte Carlo simulations on treelike signed graphs to predict that a sufficient propensity to heterophobia can impede a consensus that would otherwise emerge via a phase transition. As the strength of heterophobic interactions and the rationality of individuals with respect to social stress decrease, this transition changes from continuous to discontinuous, with a strong dependence on the initial conditions. The size of the parameter region where consensus can be reached from any initial condition decays as a power-law function of the number of discussed topics.

Physical review. EVol. 112(6)
University of Havana (CU), Istituto Nanoscienze (IT), Istituto di Nanotecnologia (IT), Complexity Science Hub (AT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities, Universiteit van Amsterdam, National Nanotechnology Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Heterophobic interactions hinder consensus formation in sparse random networks — Karl J. Friston · Physical review. E (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS