Eccentricity signatures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s binary neutron star and neutron-star black holes

Measurement of the eccentricity of low-mass binary systems through gravitational waves is crucial to distinguish between various formation channels. However, detecting eccentricity in these systems has been challenging due to the lack of accurate eccentric waveform models and the high computational cost associated with Bayesian inferences for systems with low-mass objects. In this work, we assess the eccentricities of seven previously observed low-mass gravitational wave events using publicly available data from the O1-O4a observing runs of the LIGO and Virgo observatories. We analyze the events using a new eccentric waveform model, seobnrv5ehm, and compare our results with the existing model, teobresums-dali. We also present the first eccentricity constraints for GW190814. To improve the accuracy of our parameter estimation, we include higher-order modes in both waveform models. We optimize inference by employing efficient marginalization techniques to alleviate the computational costs associated with low-mass systems and parallelization techniques for sampling large parameter spaces. We find that one of the sources, GW200105, exhibits a non-negligible eccentricity, with a measured eccentricity of $e=0.12{5}_{\ensuremath{-}0.082}^{+0.029}$ at 20 Hz (90% credible level) for seobnrv5ehm and $e=0.13{5}_{\ensuremath{-}0.088}^{+0.019}$ for teobresums-dali for a uniform eccentricity prior ranging from 0 to 0.2 at a reference frequency of 20 Hz. We find moderate support for the eccentric waveform hypothesis with a Bayes factor of $\ensuremath{\sim}6--7$ times more preference for the eccentric model over the noneccentric one. When using a uniform log prior on eccentricity with a minimum bound of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$, the support for the eccentric model decreases, with the Bayes factor reduced to 2.35. For the remaining five sources, the results are consistent with low eccentricity, with 90% upper limits ranging from $e\ensuremath{\le}0.011$ to $e\ensuremath{\le}0.066$. We do not find any support for non-negligible eccentricity in GW190814. Finally, we discuss the challenges of performing Bayesian inference in eccentric, multimodal parameter spaces, including issues related to sampling efficiency and waveform systematics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/jnsc-783p
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eccentricity signatures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s binary neutron star and neutron-star black holes

Karl J. Friston
2 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
2.31
article

Eccentricity signatures in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s binary neutron star and neutron-star black holes

Karl J. Friston
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Measurement of the eccentricity of low-mass binary systems through gravitational waves is crucial to distinguish between various formation channels. However, detecting eccentricity in these systems has been challenging due to the lack of accurate eccentric waveform models and the high computational cost associated with Bayesian inferences for systems with low-mass objects. In this work, we assess the eccentricities of seven previously observed low-mass gravitational wave events using publicly available data from the O1-O4a observing runs of the LIGO and Virgo observatories. We analyze the events using a new eccentric waveform model, seobnrv5ehm, and compare our results with the existing model, teobresums-dali. We also present the first eccentricity constraints for GW190814. To improve the accuracy of our parameter estimation, we include higher-order modes in both waveform models. We optimize inference by employing efficient marginalization techniques to alleviate the computational costs associated with low-mass systems and parallelization techniques for sampling large parameter spaces. We find that one of the sources, GW200105, exhibits a non-negligible eccentricity, with a measured eccentricity of $e=0.12{5}_{\ensuremath{-}0.082}^{+0.029}$ at 20 Hz (90% credible level) for seobnrv5ehm and $e=0.13{5}_{\ensuremath{-}0.088}^{+0.019}$ for teobresums-dali for a uniform eccentricity prior ranging from 0 to 0.2 at a reference frequency of 20 Hz. We find moderate support for the eccentric waveform hypothesis with a Bayes factor of $\ensuremath{\sim}6--7$ times more preference for the eccentric model over the noneccentric one. When using a uniform log prior on eccentricity with a minimum bound of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$, the support for the eccentric model decreases, with the Bayes factor reduced to 2.35. For the remaining five sources, the results are consistent with low eccentricity, with 90% upper limits ranging from $e\ensuremath{\le}0.011$ to $e\ensuremath{\le}0.066$. We do not find any support for non-negligible eccentricity in GW190814. Finally, we discuss the challenges of performing Bayesian inference in eccentric, multimodal parameter spaces, including issues related to sampling efficiency and waveform systematics.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(12)
Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.