Revisiting Tools for Change: Reflections on Methodologies and Desire-based Approaches in Roma-related Research

In this article, I revisit some of the main critiques, questions and suggestions in relation to methodological approaches emergingalongside the discipline of Critical Romani Studies. Drawing from Indigenous Studies scholar Eve Tuck’s notion of desire-basedresearch, I apply the three goals that Tuck set to foster emancipatory methodologies as a framework to reflect on the strengths andlimitations of previously proposed methodologies in Romanirelated research. By establishing counterhistories of Roma, Romanischolarship, a reconfiguration of the archive, and reflections on critical whiteness as the main topics in the epistemological paradigmshift unfolding over the past decade, I suggest some further points for methodological consideration that could advance the discipline.In particular, I discuss the possibility of co-researching as a mode of participatory knowledge production and propose digital platforms as a potential site of research, as well as call for further reflections on how to make research results more accessible to wider audiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Romani Studies
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v8i1.232
Primary Topic
Romani and Gypsy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Tools for Change: Reflections on Methodologies and Desire-based Approaches in Roma-related Research

Sanni Matleena Lindroos
Critical Romani Studies
Romani and Gypsy Studies
article

Revisiting Tools for Change: Reflections on Methodologies and Desire-based Approaches in Roma-related Research

Sanni Matleena Lindroos
article en

Abstract

In this article, I revisit some of the main critiques, questions and suggestions in relation to methodological approaches emergingalongside the discipline of Critical Romani Studies. Drawing from Indigenous Studies scholar Eve Tuck’s notion of desire-basedresearch, I apply the three goals that Tuck set to foster emancipatory methodologies as a framework to reflect on the strengths andlimitations of previously proposed methodologies in Romanirelated research. By establishing counterhistories of Roma, Romanischolarship, a reconfiguration of the archive, and reflections on critical whiteness as the main topics in the epistemological paradigmshift unfolding over the past decade, I suggest some further points for methodological consideration that could advance the discipline.In particular, I discuss the possibility of co-researching as a mode of participatory knowledge production and propose digital platforms as a potential site of research, as well as call for further reflections on how to make research results more accessible to wider audiences.

Critical Romani StudiesVol. 8(1)
Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Romani and Gypsy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.