Development of a multiple-choice test to assess critical thinking in climate change

Recognizing the complex environmental challenges that humanity faces, there is a growing need to develop critical thinking skills specifically oriented toward understanding and addressing climate change. To facilitate the assessment of these skills, a critical thinking in climate change () test was developed. In the first step, 16 semistructured interviews were conducted with high school and university students. Drawing on insights from these interviews alongside previous research, a first version of the test comprising 41 items was administered to a sample of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="italic">N</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>2</a:mn> <a:mn>8</a:mn> <a:mn>9</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> high school and university students from Austria, Belgium, and Germany. The test development process and subsequent evaluation were performed using Rasch modeling to determine test functioning. Through an iterative process that included three rounds of testing involving a total number of <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:mrow> <d:mi mathvariant="italic">N</d:mi> <d:mo>=</d:mo> <d:mn>8</d:mn> <d:mn>0</d:mn> <d:mn>9</d:mn> </d:mrow> </d:math> students and analyses, the test items were revised. The final version of the test consists of 24 items. Results from Rasch analysis suggest that the test has high item reliability (0.96) and person reliability (0.80), making it a useful tool for assessing critical thinking skills among high school graduates and first-semester university students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/jnbq-1qyk
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a multiple-choice test to assess critical thinking in climate change

Karl J. Friston
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Development of a multiple-choice test to assess critical thinking in climate change

Karl J. Friston
article en

Abstract

Recognizing the complex environmental challenges that humanity faces, there is a growing need to develop critical thinking skills specifically oriented toward understanding and addressing climate change. To facilitate the assessment of these skills, a critical thinking in climate change () test was developed. In the first step, 16 semistructured interviews were conducted with high school and university students. Drawing on insights from these interviews alongside previous research, a first version of the test comprising 41 items was administered to a sample of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="italic">N</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>2</a:mn> <a:mn>8</a:mn> <a:mn>9</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> high school and university students from Austria, Belgium, and Germany. The test development process and subsequent evaluation were performed using Rasch modeling to determine test functioning. Through an iterative process that included three rounds of testing involving a total number of <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:mrow> <d:mi mathvariant="italic">N</d:mi> <d:mo>=</d:mo> <d:mn>8</d:mn> <d:mn>0</d:mn> <d:mn>9</d:mn> </d:mrow> </d:math> students and analyses, the test items were revised. The final version of the test consists of 24 items. Results from Rasch analysis suggest that the test has high item reliability (0.96) and person reliability (0.80), making it a useful tool for assessing critical thinking skills among high school graduates and first-semester university students.

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 21(2)
Universität Innsbruck (AT), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.