Criteria for parabolicity and hyperbolicity of conductive Riemannian manifolds

Motivated by the physics of anisotropic conductive materials we consider a linear elliptic operator Δ W of divergence type on a Riemannian manifold ( M n , g ) . The operator is determined by the metric g and by a given conductivity , which is modeled by a smooth self adjoint tensor field W of type ( 1 , 1 ) . We establish new conditions for a conductive manifold ( M , g , W ) to be W -parabolic or W -hyperbolic. Here, by definition, a W -hyperbolic manifold (as opposed to a W -parabolic manifold) admits an effective electric current J , i.e. a bounded potential function u , which is a solution to the W -Laplace equation Δ W u = 0 with a finite flux of the current J = − W ( ∇ u ) to infinity. We prove a number of intrinsic conditions on g and W , that tell the type ( W -hyperbolic or W -parabolic) of conductive Riemannian manifolds. And we prove similar extrinsic conditions for submanifolds (involving also naturally the second fundamental form), that give the type of the submanifolds when they are endowed with the inherited conductivities from the ambient conductive space. Our results are furthermore illustrated by corresponding families of examples, which emphasize how the present setting and results generalize previous findings concerning the usual Laplacian for Riemannian manifolds (with homogeneous, constant, conductivity) as well as similar recent results for weighted manifolds and submanifolds – see e.g. [17] , [30] , [13] and references therein. We also present novel examples of W -hyperbolic manifolds where the conductivity tensor is ‘extracted’ from the curvature tensor of the manifold itself, such as e.g. the metric equivalents of the Einstein tensor and the Schouten tensor.