Implementation and Evaluation of a Wellness Program in a First-Year Medical Student Anatomy Course

Introduction: Cadaveric dissection is a central component to anatomy education. However, for many students, dissection can be emotionally taxing, highlighting a potential area for increased support. This project evaluated the implementation of a wellness program within a dissection-based anatomy course. Methods: Throughout a 12-week first-year medical student anatomy course, two teaching assistants (TAs) served as “Wellness TAs” and implemented a structured wellness program that included weekly office hours, supportive emails to students that addressed emotionally challenging coursework, and scheduled “wellness breakfasts/snack breaks.” An anonymous survey was distributed following the course. The survey assessed demographics, perceptions of the anatomical donor, emotional difficulty of course, coping mechanisms, utilization and efficacy of the wellness interventions. Results: The survey response rate was 44% (72/162). Emotional difficulty of anatomy was rated on a scale from 0 (not challenging) to 100 (extremely challenging), with respondents reporting a mean emotional difficulty of 44.4 ± 22.4 (SD); (range = 95, mode = 50, median = 50). Male gender was associated with a lower reported emotional difficulty compared to female gender (34.7 ± 22.3 (SD) vs. 48.3 ± 22.5 (SD), p=0.02, t=-2.338, F(2,62)=3.32, R2=0.097, Adjusted R2=0.068). Additionally, the specimen-view was associated with lower reported emotional difficulty compared to the person-view (35.4 ± 21.6 (SD) vs. 55.8 ± 19.4 (SD), p <0.001, t=-3.99, F(1,66)=15.97, R2=0.195, Adjusted R2=0.183). Age, first-generation physician status, and preferred specialty choice were not associated with emotional difficulty. When asked about coping and support mechanisms, the majority of respondents utilized informal, peer-based coping mechanisms. Respondents found the email warnings to be the most effective initiative, followed by the wellness breakfasts/snacks. Qualitative survey responses commonly highlighted difficulties surrounding the first day of dissection and head/neck dissections. Conclusion: Within a first-year medical student anatomy course, students more commonly engaged in informal coping mechanisms compared with formal wellness support. When engaged with, wellness initiatives were seen as very or extremely effective by almost half of respondents. Proactive strategies and food-based meetings were most effective. Future iterations of wellness programs could benefit from a focus on these strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wellness
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55504/2578-9333.1312
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation and Evaluation of a Wellness Program in a First-Year Medical Student Anatomy Course

Daniel M. DePietro, Nicole Robinson, Benjamin Abramoff, Gavin Turner et al.
Journal of Wellness
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Implementation and Evaluation of a Wellness Program in a First-Year Medical Student Anatomy Course

Daniel M. DePietro, Nicole Robinson, Benjamin Abramoff, Gavin Turner, Gina Lepore
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Cadaveric dissection is a central component to anatomy education. However, for many students, dissection can be emotionally taxing, highlighting a potential area for increased support. This project evaluated the implementation of a wellness program within a dissection-based anatomy course. Methods: Throughout a 12-week first-year medical student anatomy course, two teaching assistants (TAs) served as “Wellness TAs” and implemented a structured wellness program that included weekly office hours, supportive emails to students that addressed emotionally challenging coursework, and scheduled “wellness breakfasts/snack breaks.” An anonymous survey was distributed following the course. The survey assessed demographics, perceptions of the anatomical donor, emotional difficulty of course, coping mechanisms, utilization and efficacy of the wellness interventions. Results: The survey response rate was 44% (72/162). Emotional difficulty of anatomy was rated on a scale from 0 (not challenging) to 100 (extremely challenging), with respondents reporting a mean emotional difficulty of 44.4 ± 22.4 (SD); (range = 95, mode = 50, median = 50). Male gender was associated with a lower reported emotional difficulty compared to female gender (34.7 ± 22.3 (SD) vs. 48.3 ± 22.5 (SD), p=0.02, t=-2.338, F(2,62)=3.32, R2=0.097, Adjusted R2=0.068). Additionally, the specimen-view was associated with lower reported emotional difficulty compared to the person-view (35.4 ± 21.6 (SD) vs. 55.8 ± 19.4 (SD), p <0.001, t=-3.99, F(1,66)=15.97, R2=0.195, Adjusted R2=0.183). Age, first-generation physician status, and preferred specialty choice were not associated with emotional difficulty. When asked about coping and support mechanisms, the majority of respondents utilized informal, peer-based coping mechanisms. Respondents found the email warnings to be the most effective initiative, followed by the wellness breakfasts/snacks. Qualitative survey responses commonly highlighted difficulties surrounding the first day of dissection and head/neck dissections. Conclusion: Within a first-year medical student anatomy course, students more commonly engaged in informal coping mechanisms compared with formal wellness support. When engaged with, wellness initiatives were seen as very or extremely effective by almost half of respondents. Proactive strategies and food-based meetings were most effective. Future iterations of wellness programs could benefit from a focus on these strategies.

Journal of WellnessVol. 6(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.