The Influence of Speech Material, Intelligibility, and Masker Type on the Pupil Dilation Response in Cochlear Implant Users

The intelligibility conditions in this study did not result in any measurable differences in listening effort, as indicated by the pupil dilation responses of unilateral or bimodal postlingually deafened CI users for everyday sentences or CVC words. A main effect of intelligibility condition on PPD was only found for digit triplets. Speculatively, this may be because the relative simplicity and low cognitive load evoked by this speech material allowed intelligibility effects to become apparent in this specific group of listeners. Subjective ratings indicated greater listening effort, difficulty, and a tendency to give up at lower intelligibility levels. When sentences were masked with an interfering speaker, both PPD and subjective listening effort increased compared with masking with continuous noise. These findings suggest that manipulating masker type can alter the pupil dilation response and perceived listening effort in CI users, even when using everyday sentences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001761
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Speech Material, Intelligibility, and Masker Type on the Pupil Dilation Response in Cochlear Implant Users

Sophia E. Kramer, Jessica H.J. de Ruijter, Johan H. M. Frijns, H. Christiaan Stronks et al.
Ear and Hearing
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

The Influence of Speech Material, Intelligibility, and Masker Type on the Pupil Dilation Response in Cochlear Implant Users

Sophia E. Kramer, Jessica H.J. de Ruijter, Johan H. M. Frijns, H. Christiaan Stronks, Cas Smits, Adriana A. Zekveld
article en

Abstract

The intelligibility conditions in this study did not result in any measurable differences in listening effort, as indicated by the pupil dilation responses of unilateral or bimodal postlingually deafened CI users for everyday sentences or CVC words. A main effect of intelligibility condition on PPD was only found for digit triplets. Speculatively, this may be because the relative simplicity and low cognitive load evoked by this speech material allowed intelligibility effects to become apparent in this specific group of listeners. Subjective ratings indicated greater listening effort, difficulty, and a tendency to give up at lower intelligibility levels. When sentences were masked with an interfering speaker, both PPD and subjective listening effort increased compared with masking with continuous noise. These findings suggest that manipulating masker type can alter the pupil dilation response and perceived listening effort in CI users, even when using everyday sentences.

Ear and Hearing
Leiden University (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Influence of Speech Material, Intelligibility, and Masker Type on the Pupil Dilation Response in Cochlear Implant Users — Sophia E. Kramer, Jessica H.J. de Ruijter, et al. · Ear and Hearing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS