COSMOS-Web: Unraveling the Evolution of Galaxy Size and Related Properties at 2 &lt; <i>z</i> &lt; 10

Abstract We measure galaxy sizes from 2 &lt; z &lt; 10 using COSMOS-Web, the largest-area JWST imaging survey to date, covering ∼0.54 deg 2 . We analyze the rest-frame optical (∼5000 Å) size evolution and its scaling relation with stellar mass ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∝</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> ) for star-forming and quiescent galaxies. For star-forming galaxies, the slope α remains approximately 0.20 at 2 &lt; z &lt; 8, showing no significant evolution over this redshift range. At higher redshifts, the slopes are −0.13 ± 0.15 and 0.37 ± 0.36 for 8 &lt; z &lt; 9 and 9 &lt; z &lt; 10, respectively. At fixed galaxy mass, the size evolution for star-forming galaxies follows R e ∝ (1 + z ) −1.21±0.05 . For quiescent galaxies, the size–mass relation is steeper with α ∼ 0.5–0.8 at 2 &lt; z &lt; 5, and size evolves as R e ∝ (1 + z ) −0.81±0.26 . We find that the size−mass relation is consistent between UV and optical at z &lt; 8 for star-forming galaxies. However, we observe a decrease in the slope from UV to optical at z &gt; 8, with a tentative negative slope in the optical at 8 &lt; z &lt; 9, suggesting a complex interplay between intrinsic galaxy properties and observational effects such as dust attenuation. We discuss the ratio between galaxies’ half-light radius and underlying halos’ virial radius, R vir , and find the median value of R e / R vir = 2.7%. The star formation rate surface density evolves as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace width="0.1em"/> <mml:mtext>SFR</mml:mtext> <mml:mspace width="0.1em"/> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kpc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:math> (0.20 ± 0.08) z + (−0.65 ± 0.51), and the Σ SFR – M * relation remains flat at 2 &lt; z &lt; 10. Lastly, we identify a threshold in stellar mass surface density <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kpc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:math> marking the transition to compact, quenched galaxies from extended, star-forming progenitors. In summary, our findings show that the extensive COSMOS-Web dataset at z &gt; 3 provides new insights into galaxy size and related properties in the rest-frame optical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ae0e1b
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COSMOS-Web: Unraveling the Evolution of Galaxy Size and Related Properties at 2 < z < 10

Louise Paquereau, Xuheng Ding, Si-Yue Yu, Lilan Yang et al.
7 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
8.08
article

COSMOS-Web: Unraveling the Evolution of Galaxy Size and Related Properties at 2 < z < 10

Louise Paquereau, Xuheng Ding, Si-Yue Yu, Lilan Yang, Marko Shuntov, Hollis B. Akins, G. Gozaliasl, Shuowen Jin, J. D. Silverman, R. Massey, H. J. McCracken, Nicole E. Drakos, Anton M. Koekemoer, Caitlin M. Casey, O. Ilbert, G. Magdis, Maximilien Franco, Jason Rhodes, Brant E. Robertson, Steven Gillman, Sune Toft, Rafael C. Arango-Toro, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Daizhong Liu, Takumi S. Tanaka, Andreas L. Faisst, Natalie Allen, Mark J. Achenbach
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract We measure galaxy sizes from 2 &lt; z &lt; 10 using COSMOS-Web, the largest-area JWST imaging survey to date, covering ∼0.54 deg 2 . We analyze the rest-frame optical (∼5000 Å) size evolution and its scaling relation with stellar mass ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∝</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> ) for star-forming and quiescent galaxies. For star-forming galaxies, the slope α remains approximately 0.20 at 2 &lt; z &lt; 8, showing no significant evolution over this redshift range. At higher redshifts, the slopes are −0.13 ± 0.15 and 0.37 ± 0.36 for 8 &lt; z &lt; 9 and 9 &lt; z &lt; 10, respectively. At fixed galaxy mass, the size evolution for star-forming galaxies follows R e ∝ (1 + z ) −1.21±0.05 . For quiescent galaxies, the size–mass relation is steeper with α ∼ 0.5–0.8 at 2 &lt; z &lt; 5, and size evolves as R e ∝ (1 + z ) −0.81±0.26 . We find that the size−mass relation is consistent between UV and optical at z &lt; 8 for star-forming galaxies. However, we observe a decrease in the slope from UV to optical at z &gt; 8, with a tentative negative slope in the optical at 8 &lt; z &lt; 9, suggesting a complex interplay between intrinsic galaxy properties and observational effects such as dust attenuation. We discuss the ratio between galaxies’ half-light radius and underlying halos’ virial radius, R vir , and find the median value of R e / R vir = 2.7%. The star formation rate surface density evolves as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace width="0.1em"/> <mml:mtext>SFR</mml:mtext> <mml:mspace width="0.1em"/> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kpc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:math> (0.20 ± 0.08) z + (−0.65 ± 0.51), and the Σ SFR – M * relation remains flat at 2 &lt; z &lt; 10. Lastly, we identify a threshold in stellar mass surface density <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kpc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:math> marking the transition to compact, quenched galaxies from extended, star-forming progenitors. In summary, our findings show that the extensive COSMOS-Web dataset at z &gt; 3 provides new insights into galaxy size and related properties in the rest-frame optical.

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesVol. 281(2)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), California Institute of Technology (US), University of Copenhagen (DK), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Space Telescope Science Institute (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Helsinki (FI), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Rochester Institute of Technology (US), Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (JP), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Durham University (GB), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Université Paris Cité (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Observatoire de Paris (FR), Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (FR), Purple Mountain Observatory (CN), University of Hawaii at Hilo (US), Wuhan University (CN), Sorbonne Université (FR), Astrophysique, Instrumentation et Modélisation (FR), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES), Infrared Processing and Analysis Center (US), The University of Tokyo (JP), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Technical University of Denmark (DK), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
8.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.