Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Objective Prevalence rates of depression and anxiety in patients with a serious physical illness are high. Psychodynamic psychotherapies show potential in mitigating such psychological distress because they address hindering relational experiences and unconscious conflicts that may impair patients’ capacity to cope with illness‐related distress. We investigated the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with serious physical illness. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search to identify randomized controlled trials and quasi‐experiments of psychodynamic psychotherapies in adults with serious physical illness. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analyses and narrative summaries. Results We identified 15,112 records and included 5 RCTs ( n = 648, mean age: 52.4 years, 69% female). Meta‐analyses showed no significant differences between psychodynamic and standard treatment for the reduction of depressive symptoms in serious physical illness (SMD = −0.24, 95% CI: −0.87 to 0.39). No meta‐analysis was calculated for anxiety symptoms due to the small number of studies investigating this outcome. Conclusion Quantitative evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy in this population is inconclusive. More research is needed with regard to effective intervention length and adequate outcome measures, especially in patients with incurable illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cancer Care
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ecc/4791709
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Sigrun Vehling, R Philipp, Karin Oechsle, Martin Härter et al.
European Journal of Cancer Care
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Serious Physical Illness: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Sigrun Vehling, R Philipp, Karin Oechsle, Martin Härter, Charlotte Walbaum, Carsten Bokemeyer
article en

Abstract

Objective Prevalence rates of depression and anxiety in patients with a serious physical illness are high. Psychodynamic psychotherapies show potential in mitigating such psychological distress because they address hindering relational experiences and unconscious conflicts that may impair patients’ capacity to cope with illness‐related distress. We investigated the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with serious physical illness. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search to identify randomized controlled trials and quasi‐experiments of psychodynamic psychotherapies in adults with serious physical illness. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analyses and narrative summaries. Results We identified 15,112 records and included 5 RCTs ( n = 648, mean age: 52.4 years, 69% female). Meta‐analyses showed no significant differences between psychodynamic and standard treatment for the reduction of depressive symptoms in serious physical illness (SMD = −0.24, 95% CI: −0.87 to 0.39). No meta‐analysis was calculated for anxiety symptoms due to the small number of studies investigating this outcome. Conclusion Quantitative evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy in this population is inconclusive. More research is needed with regard to effective intervention length and adequate outcome measures, especially in patients with incurable illness.

European Journal of Cancer CareVol. 2025(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Martini-Klinik (DE)
Deutsche Krebshilfe
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.