An assessment of Antarctic sea-ice thickness in CMIP6 simulations with comparison to the satellite-based observations and reanalyses

Abstract. Sea-ice thickness, though critical to our understanding of sea-ice variability, remains relatively understudied compared to surface sea-ice parameters in the Southern Ocean. To remedy this, we examine spatio-temporal variations in sea-ice thickness by analyzing historical simulations from 39 coupled climate models in CMIP6, comparing them with three sea-ice products, including satellite-derived observations and reanalyses. Furthermore, we compare seasonal trends in simulated sea-ice thickness with trends in sea-ice area. Our results indicate that CMIP6 models can replicate the mean seasonal cycle and spatial patterns of sea-ice thickness. During its maximum in February, these models align well with satellite-based observation products. However, during the annual minima, CMIP6 models show significant agreement with the reanalysis products. Certain models exhibit unrealistic historical mean states compared to the sea-ice products resulting in significant inter-model spread. CMIP6 models can simulate sea-ice area more accurately than the sea-ice thickness. They also simulate a positive relationship between the two parameters in September such that models with greater area tend to exhibit thicker ice. In contrast, there is a negative relationship in February when greater area is associated with lower thickness since only the thicker ice survives the summer melt. Moreover, our study highlights significant positive trends in sea-ice thickness observed during the cooler seasons, which are nearly absent in the warmer seasons where positive trends are predominantly observed in sea-ice area. The spatial distribution of SIT biases is closely linked to uncertainties in modeling the ice edge and the dynamic processes, emphasizing the need for better model representation of both. This study, therefore, highlights the need for improved representation of Antarctic sea-ice processes in models for accurate projections of thickness and related volume changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6771-2025
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An assessment of Antarctic sea-ice thickness in CMIP6 simulations with comparison to the satellite-based observations and reanalyses

Marilyn Raphael, Shreya Trivedi, Will Hobbs
˜The œcryosphere
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

An assessment of Antarctic sea-ice thickness in CMIP6 simulations with comparison to the satellite-based observations and reanalyses

Marilyn Raphael, Shreya Trivedi, Will Hobbs
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Sea-ice thickness, though critical to our understanding of sea-ice variability, remains relatively understudied compared to surface sea-ice parameters in the Southern Ocean. To remedy this, we examine spatio-temporal variations in sea-ice thickness by analyzing historical simulations from 39 coupled climate models in CMIP6, comparing them with three sea-ice products, including satellite-derived observations and reanalyses. Furthermore, we compare seasonal trends in simulated sea-ice thickness with trends in sea-ice area. Our results indicate that CMIP6 models can replicate the mean seasonal cycle and spatial patterns of sea-ice thickness. During its maximum in February, these models align well with satellite-based observation products. However, during the annual minima, CMIP6 models show significant agreement with the reanalysis products. Certain models exhibit unrealistic historical mean states compared to the sea-ice products resulting in significant inter-model spread. CMIP6 models can simulate sea-ice area more accurately than the sea-ice thickness. They also simulate a positive relationship between the two parameters in September such that models with greater area tend to exhibit thicker ice. In contrast, there is a negative relationship in February when greater area is associated with lower thickness since only the thicker ice survives the summer melt. Moreover, our study highlights significant positive trends in sea-ice thickness observed during the cooler seasons, which are nearly absent in the warmer seasons where positive trends are predominantly observed in sea-ice area. The spatial distribution of SIT biases is closely linked to uncertainties in modeling the ice edge and the dynamic processes, emphasizing the need for better model representation of both. This study, therefore, highlights the need for improved representation of Antarctic sea-ice processes in models for accurate projections of thickness and related volume changes.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 19(12)
Australian Antarctic Division (AU), University of California, Los Angeles (US)
National Science Foundation, Australian Government, Office of Polar Programs
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.