Diverging views between clinicians, service users, family caregivers and researchers on the classification of restrictive practices in mental health services

Mental health stakeholders' interpretations of RPs were often shaped not only by the inherent coercive nature of actions but also by the context in which they occurred and the professional role of the assessors. This underscores the need for harmonized definitions and classification frameworks for RPs, co-designed with diverse stakeholders. Addressing less visible forms of RPs in policy and clinical practice is also essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796025100322
Primary Topic
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diverging views between clinicians, service users, family caregivers and researchers on the classification of restrictive practices in mental health services

Sau Fong Leung, Den‐Ching A. Lee, Maria Bakola, Eimear Muir‐Cochrane et al.
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
article

Diverging views between clinicians, service users, family caregivers and researchers on the classification of restrictive practices in mental health services

Sau Fong Leung, Den‐Ching A. Lee, Maria Bakola, Eimear Muir‐Cochrane, Didier Demassosso, Julie Ridley, Marie‐Hélène Goulet, Deborah Oyine Aluh, Yoav Kohn, Giles Newton‐Howes, Emer Diviney, Kathleen De Cuyper, Eleni Jelastopulu, Lesley Barr, Jacqueline Sin, Justus Uchenna Onu, Terry Peter Haines, Melissa Petrakis, Tonje Lossius Husum, Min Gyu Kim, Zelalem Belayneh, Yana Canteloupe
article en

Abstract

Mental health stakeholders' interpretations of RPs were often shaped not only by the inherent coercive nature of actions but also by the context in which they occurred and the professional role of the assessors. This underscores the need for harmonized definitions and classification frameworks for RPs, co-designed with diverse stakeholders. Addressing less visible forms of RPs in policy and clinical practice is also essential.

Epidemiology and Psychiatric SciencesVol. 34
University of Nigeria (NG), University of Lisbon (PT), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), Flinders University (AU), University of Patras (GR), Curtin University (AU), Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NG), Federal Neuro Psychiatric Hospital (NG), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine (JP), DH Consultancy BVBA (Belgium) (BE), National Drug Addiction Center (BG), Peninsula Health (AU), Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA), Dilla University (ET), St. Vincent Hospital (US), Metropolitan University (BD), Hadassah (US), City St George's, University of London (GB), Monash University (AU), Université de Montréal (CA), University of Otago (NZ), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.