Where to next for managing contentious flying-fox roosts? Research questions that could contribute to a new future for an ongoing human-wildlife issue

ABSTRACT Flying-fox roosts near human settlements remain an ongoing and complex management issue. A spectrum of management options exists, ranging from less intense forms of intervention such as community engagement and routine site maintenance activities to more intensive interventions such as creating buffers and colony dispersals. However, there are several limitations to effectiveness, which render community tensions in many scenarios ongoing even after land managers have applied all levels of conceivable management actions, including attempting to relocate the animals. Such dilemmas highlight the need for bolstering the effectiveness of current management options or exploration of new approaches. To this end, this paper canvasses research questions in respect to each level of management intervention. The knowledge gaps we highlight require attention from a wide range of scientific disciplines including animal behavioural ecology, plant biology, soil science, social science and materials science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Zoologist
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2025.041
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where to next for managing contentious flying-fox roosts? Research questions that could contribute to a new future for an ongoing human-wildlife issue

Matthew Mo, Stephen F. Curran
Australian Zoologist
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Where to next for managing contentious flying-fox roosts? Research questions that could contribute to a new future for an ongoing human-wildlife issue

Matthew Mo, Stephen F. Curran
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Flying-fox roosts near human settlements remain an ongoing and complex management issue. A spectrum of management options exists, ranging from less intense forms of intervention such as community engagement and routine site maintenance activities to more intensive interventions such as creating buffers and colony dispersals. However, there are several limitations to effectiveness, which render community tensions in many scenarios ongoing even after land managers have applied all levels of conceivable management actions, including attempting to relocate the animals. Such dilemmas highlight the need for bolstering the effectiveness of current management options or exploration of new approaches. To this end, this paper canvasses research questions in respect to each level of management intervention. The knowledge gaps we highlight require attention from a wide range of scientific disciplines including animal behavioural ecology, plant biology, soil science, social science and materials science.

Australian ZoologistVol. 44(4)
NSW Department of Planning and Environment (AU), Society for Conservation Biology (US), Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where to next for managing contentious flying-fox roosts? Research questions that could contribute to a new future for an ongoing human-wildlife issue — Matthew Mo, Stephen F. Curran · Australian Zoologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS